Last Tuesday, Americans robustly rejected Miller’s dark, dangerous agenda. 2
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Connecticut
Richard Blumenthal
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 915
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Richard Blumenthal
U.S. SenatorDemocratConnecticut
SoupScore
Richard's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 132 sponsored · 705 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Days after Americans turned out to vote for change, Trump hands the keys to Stephen Miller—chief architect of his cruel, costly failures. Miller has fought relentlessly to make life harder for working families & terrorize immigrant communities. 1/
No veteran should go homeless. Excited & honored to join the National Veterans Council for Legal Redress to announce nearly $2 million in federal funding to help create permanent housing for at-risk veterans.
Targets of my investigations—immigration abuses, Big Tech, crypto corruption, & more—should be on high alert.
As incoming chair of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, I’m sending a warning to all who’ve failed to cooperate.
Message to possible buyers of Fanendes tanker diesel: Congress is watching, & a future Administration will potentially pursue prosecution. To the tanker’s captain: Stay Away. www.kyivpost.com/post/89197
I will keep fighting to lower electricity costs & protect projects that develop clean, alternative energy sources & lessen our dependence on fossil fuels.
Today marks the beginning of a new electricity era in CT. With Revolution Wind fully operational, CT’s electricity supply will be greener & more affordable. With fuel costs continuing to climb, this project couldn’t have been completed at a better time.
Google is once again prioritizing profits over people—this time blocking schools from using Google Search unless they opt into their A.I. overview. Clearly, the Tech Giant is more concerned with forcing Gemini into schools than enabling students to succeed www.nytimes.com/2026/11/03/u...
Continuing strong support for UAW workers at Triumph as they strike for better wages, health care & working conditions. This defense contractor must recognize their employees’ value & justly compensate them.
Thinking of my great friend & colleague, Chris Murphy. I know how fiercely he fights & I'm certain I'll be welcoming him back to the Senate soon.
Dress for Success fashion benefit was a huge success— helping 9,000 women over the past 21 years enter the workforce. Thanks to great leaders!
Sending federal election monitors to New Haven is more about intimidating voters than protecting election integrity. There is no evidence of fraud or illegality—not a scintilla—that justifies this overreaching by a DOJ that should be pursuing real wrongdoing.
A powerful partnership between Middletown’s Community Health Center & New Horizons Domestic Violence Services at their fundraising event Hope Grows Here. A magnificent greenhouse!
We made a promise to our Afghan allies—that after aiding & protecting our troops during the conflict in Afghanistan, America would not abandon them. This Administration is betraying that promise, deporting them to potential torture & death. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/30/w...
Moving Domestic Violence Vigil at Greenwich’s YWCA honoring amazing advocates & leaders. Honored to join you.
Stop Trump from profiting corruptly from his own catastrophic illegal war—as owner of skyrocketing amounts of oil company stock.
Obscene soaring oil company profits—doubling at Exxon, tripling at Chevron—provide new powerful support for the windfall profits tax I’ve proposed. Put part of those profits back in consumer pockets. www.wsj.com/business/ene...
Sports betting & prediction markets have exploded—without safeguards to protect people from their addictive & exploitative tactics. Thank you Conard students for your immensely valuable insights in our conversation.
A historic groundbreaking for Enfield’s new train station—a boon to economic growth, job creation, air quality, & travel safety & speed. Glad that federal funding helped make it possible.
Excited to visit the Ledge Light Health District in New London—announcing a $675,000 grant to The Place for CommUNITY Wellbeing. It enables purchase & renovation of a building for one-stop access to diverse services.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History915 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
915 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (47-41) |
| 2026-09-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2026-09-30 | H.R. 9340 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (57-43, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-30 | H.R. 7008 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-29 | S. Res. 852 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 852 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-51) |
| 2026-09-29 | S.J. Res. 197 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-51) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (77-22) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-54, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (1-94) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (96-1) |
| 2026-09-24 | H. Con. Res. 89 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (74-25, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Amendment Agreed to (77-23) |
| 2026-09-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2026-09-22 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (70-21, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-45) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2026-09-17 | S. 4668 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (77-22) |
| 2026-09-15 | S. 4668 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (74-24, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-09-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-46) |
| 2026-08-08 | S. 5271 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (61-32) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
| 2026-07-28 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-07-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2026-07-23 | S.J. Res. 180 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 19Next →