For weeks I have worked alongside my fellow Democrats to fund TSA, FEMA, the Coast Guard, and more.
I was clear we could do that without sending another penny to ICE.
Finally in the dead of night, Republicans agreed.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Angela D. Alsobrooks
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 771
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 216 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I met with students from Senator Ben Cardin's Fellowship Program with the National Conference of Synagogue Youth on the Senate steps.
We talked about what it’s like serving in the Senate, my priorities for Maryland, and the importance of standing against antisemitism.
If the only “qualified” candidates are the ones who align with RFK Jr.’s anti-vaccine agenda, we're in big trouble.
Science should lead the CDC — not misinformation and yes men.
Happy Maryland Day!
I’m proud to stand with Senator Chris Van Hollen and the people who make our state the best in the nation. We stand united by our shared commitment to freedom, opportunity, and a brighter future for all.
Social Action is at the heart of Delta Sigma Theta, and I was proud to come together for the Delta Days Breakfast to strategize as our nation grapples with real challenges.
As Deltas, we know defending our democracy takes courage, and we must keep pushing back against efforts like the SAVE Act.
It’s been my honor to participate in the 37th Annual Delta Days in the Nation’s Capital with my sisters of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.
One Delta. One Mission. One Strategy. United in the fight to protect our democracy and deliver for our communities.
Both Kristi Noem and Markwayne Mullin share the one qualification Republicans value most: loyalty to the President over the law.
Mullin would continue the same failures.
That’s why I voted no — and why I won’t support another penny for ICE without real reform.
At DHS, Kristi Noem advanced an agenda rooted in political loyalty to this Administration — separating families, undermining fundamental rights, and making our communities less safe.
Markwayne Mullin would repeat those same failures.
I'm an absolute NO on his confirmation.
Americans can’t afford groceries, gas, energy bills, or rent and this is what they’re focused on?
The SAVE Act isn’t about saving anything. It’s about taking your vote. I am voting NO.
TSA, FEMA, and the Coast Guard aren't getting paid because Republicans have refused to fund them. Full stop.
Democrats have made MULTIPLE attempts to approve funding, and Republicans have rejected them.
Every. Single. Time.
Eid Mubarak! May this special day of Eid al-Fitr be filled with peace, joy, and moments that bring you closer to those you love. Wishing you continued blessings for the year ahead.
The law already requires identification to vote. The SAVE Act goes further — demanding documents that millions of Marylanders don’t have, including married women who changed their last name and those without passports.
This isn’t a mistake — it’s the strategy to shut voters out.
Celebrating Women's History Month with H3R!
Investing in women and girls is how we build the future. From financial literacy to digital access and emerging markets, when women rise, our entire economy grows. Proud to support the next generation of leaders and wealth builders.
An affordability crisis is already gripping the nation, and it’s clear this President does not care.
End the war. Save American lives. Lower our costs.
Gas prices have dramatically spiked, and more Americans have been killed in this unauthorized, illegal war of choice.
War is always paid for by working class Americans.
Earlier this month, I voted for @kaine.senate.gov's War Powers Resolution to end the President’s war with Iran. Tonight, I voted for @booker.senate.gov's War Powers Resolution to end the President’s war with Iran.
There is neither a rationale nor a strategy for this war.
I toured the Kent County EMS HQ and met the dedicated professionals who serve our community around the clock. With new federal funding for a backup generator, their lifesaving work can continue without disruption, no matter what. Our first responders deserve nothing less.
A year after this administration shut them down, VOA workers are back. A victory for the freedom of the press and democratic values.
Independent journalism is essential and worth fighting for.
This war isn’t being paid for by the people who started it.
It’s hardworking Americans who are already paying more at the pump, the grocery store, and for health care.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History771 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
771 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | S.J. Res. 184 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 184 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-04-30 | S. Res. 690 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-04-29 | S.J. Res. 99 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-04-29 | S.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-52) |
| 2026-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2026-04-28 | S.J. Res. 124 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 124 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Well Taken (51-47) |
| 2026-04-28 | S. Res. 690 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2026-04-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-37) |
| 2026-04-23 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2026-04-23 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-49) |
| 2026-04-23 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-04-23 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Padilla Amdt. No. 4855) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-23 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5159) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-23 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-52) |
| 2026-04-23 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (25-73) |
| 2026-04-23 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Markey Amdt. No. 5001) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-23 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hawley Amdt. No. 4794) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (50-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-23 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kennedy Amdt. No. 5414) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Alsobrooks Amdt. No. 5294) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 4956) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hirono Amdt. No. 4884) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (98-0) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Ossoff Amdt. No. 4897) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Lujan Amdt. No. 4798) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 4799) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | S.J. Res. 114 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 114 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (46-51) |
| 2026-04-21 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2026-04-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (47-46) |
| 2026-04-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48) |
| 2026-04-16 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 140 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-49) |
| 2026-04-15 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2026-04-15 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2026-04-15 | S.J. Res. 138 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 138 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (36-63) |
| 2026-04-15 | S.J. Res. 32 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 32 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (40-59) |
| 2026-04-15 | S.J. Res. 123 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 123 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-04-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2026-04-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2026-04-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2026-04-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-26 | S. 1383 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-25 | S.J. Res. 103 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-25 | S.J. Res. 107 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53) |
| 2026-03-24 | S.J. Res. 116 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 116 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53) |
| 2026-03-24 | S. 1383 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2026-03-24 | S. 1383 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2026-03-24 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2026-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-47) |
| 2026-03-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 16Next →