Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 338.
This resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to overturn a recent Department of Veterans Affairs regulation. If both chambers of Congress pass the joint resolution and the President signs it (or a veto is overridden), the rule is legally nullified and has no force. It also prevents the agency from issuing a substantially similar rule in the future unless Congress authorizes it by law.
The Department of Veterans Affairs rule titled "Reproductive Health Services" published at 90 Fed. Reg. 61310 (December 31, 2025).
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Under the Congressional Review Act, disapproval resolutions get expedited consideration and are not subject to a Senate filibuster; they require a simple majority in both chambers and the President's signature (or a veto override) to take effect.
This joint resolution, under the Congressional Review Act, disapproves and nullifies a Department of Veterans Affairs rule titled “Reproductive Health Services” (90 Fed.
Reg. 61310, Dec. 31, 2025).
If enacted, the rule would have no force or effect.
Narrow but highly partisan subject increases resistance; outcome hinges on chamber majorities and executive branch stance.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused Congressional Review Act disapproval that is clear about its target and immediate legal effect. It uses the standard, concise formulation to nullify a specific regulatory action.
Progressives emphasize protecting veterans' reproductive access.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize protecting veterans' reproductive access.
Likely supports the joint resolution if the VA rule restricted veterans' reproductive health access.
The persona views congressional disapproval as restoring or protecting veterans' reproductive care and rights.
This judgment is uncertain because the bill text omits the rule's substance.
Cautious and data-driven: wants to review the actual VA rule text and impact analyses before strong support or opposition.
Views congressional oversight as legitimate but worries about unintended service gaps and legal fallout.
Likely opposes the joint resolution if the VA rule limited restrictions on reproductive services or expanded abortion access.
Prefers maintaining VA discretion and limiting federal expansion of reproductive services.
Views CRA use by opposing party skeptically.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow but highly partisan subject increases resistance; outcome hinges on chamber majorities and executive branch stance.
The Senate declined to take up this bill. It cannot be debated or voted on unless the motion is tried again.
Progressives emphasize protecting veterans' reproductive access.
Narrow but highly partisan subject increases resistance; outcome hinges on chamber majorities and executive branch stance.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused Congressional Review Act disapproval that is clear about its target and immediate legal effect. It uses the standard, concise formulation to nul…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.