Affordable healthcare and medicine are imperative and worth the fight, but a strong nation is longer work.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Washington District 3
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes60%
No38%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align79%
Cross-party21%
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWashington District 3
SoupScore
Marie Gluesenkamp's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 68 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
At the same time, we can’t lose sight of the fact that national health doesn’t come from insurance coverage — it hinges on people having good jobs, being able to sleep 8 hours a night, cook real food and see their kids at night.
I’m glad to work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to bring down health care costs. Nobody wants to shell out more cash to insurance companies or PBM middlemen.
I’m pushing my colleagues in Congress to back more effective lethal removal options, because back home in Southwest Washington we know that more urgent action is needed to protect our salmon and sustain fishing communities.
Not many people in D.C. understand how serious an issue sea lions are on the Columbia River.
This coming Wednesday, December 10, my team will be in Chehalis hosting mobile office hours.
If you're getting the runaround from a federal agency like the VA or Social Security Administration, stop by! We're ready to serve you.
Timber communities in Southwest Washington have seen exacerbated budget shortfalls and school closures ever since the SRS program was allowed to lapse.
I’m calling on House leadership to bring the Senate-passed SRS reauthorization bill to the floor for a vote ASAP.
Southwest Washington has a serious predatory pinniped problem — tens of thousands of massive invasive sea lions are venturing further and further up the Columbia River and its tributaries to gorge on our local salmon.
I'm pushing to explore more effective lethal removal options.
Congratulations to James from Raintree Nursery who found this year’s winner – an absolute HONKER at 21 inches.
In Southwest Washington we love our trees, in particular our Bigleaf Maples. So, this Thanksgiving season I’m so thankful for everyone who spent time out in the woods to look for the biggest Bigleaf Maple leaf!
For anyone asking themselves, does the fact that someone’s in a uniform mean they are a legitimate target of violence, the answer is no.
I’m praying for the two victims and all our guardsmen and their families today.
Which landholders can afford not to harvest timber? The big ones. For a lot of Washingtonians this feels like Louis the Sun King telling farmers to build him a bigger golf course in a famine.
The Washington Forest Practices Board got it wrong. In a 5:7 vote they’ve pushed us further into a false choice between more consolidation of timber land and environmental ideals.
capitalpress.com/2025/11/13/w...
The brave men and women of the Coast Guard put their lives on the line to keep us all safe.
I’m grateful as always for their service to our coastal communities.
chinookobserver.com/2025/11/05/c...
I voted to release the Epstein Files. We need to go after all predators.
I’ll work with whoever is necessary to reach those goals – and I don’t give a damn which side of the aisle they sit on.
Now, it’s time for Congress to get back to work and build an economy where people aren’t yanked around by partisan interests, where we understand national health doesn’t come from insurance coverage – and reestablish a truly deliberative democracy.
The last several weeks have been a case study in why most Americans can’t stand Congress. None of my friends who rely on SNAP would want to trade their dinner for an ambiguous D.C. beltway "messaging victory" and I’m glad this ugly scene is in the rearview mirror.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.