Mazie K. Hirono headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Hawaii
Born
November 3, 1947
Age 78
Phone
(202) 224-6361
Office
109 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Hawaii

Mazie K. Hirono

Mazie Keiko Hirono is an American lawyer and politician serving since 2013 as the junior United States senator from Hawaii. A member of the Democratic Party, Hirono previously served as a member of the United States House of Representatives for Hawaii's 2nd congressional district from 2007 to 2013. She has been the dean of Hawaii's congressional delegation since 2013, when Senator Daniel Akaka retired. Hirono also served as a member of the Hawaii House of Representatives from 1981 to 1994 and as Hawaii's tenth lieutenant governor from 1994 to 2002. She was the Democratic nominee for governor of Hawaii in 2002, but lost to Republican Linda Lingle.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 772
Yes27%
No73%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mazie K. Hirono headshot
Mazie K. Hirono
U.S. SenatorDemocratHawaii
SoupScore
Mazie K.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 54 sponsored · 348 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

On Trans Day of Visibility, we are reminded to celebrate—and do more to protect—our transgender communities. LGBTQ+ people deserve health care fueled by support and affirmation, not cruelty and hate. That’s what I’ll keep fighting for. apnews.com/article/supr...
DOGE's chaotic efforts did nothing but put Americans at risk and WASTE BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars. Any attempt to justify the ill conceived plans or execution of DOGE is simply laughable.
Republicans want to sell the SAVE Trump Act as a voter ID bill. But that is not the reality. From requiring birth certificates to $165 passports, their bill would create expensive obstacles that would bar MILLIONS of eligible voters from participating in our upcoming elections.
 Women only earn 81¢ for every $1 earned by a man – a gap that's growing each year and is even wider for women of color.   As this regime continues its war on women, the fight for equal pay is critically important. People who do the same work should be paid the same – end of story.
In 2022, I worked with Rep. Grace Meng to pass a law that commissioned a study on the need for a national museum dedicated to APA history.   And now, this commission wants to hear from YOU.   RSVP or get more information here: www.eventbrite.com/e/regional-c...
Pushing for the SAVE Trump Act apparently isn't enough voter suppression for Trump. Now this regime is attacking the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to birthright citizenship, which would bar MILLIONS of eligible voters – i.e. American citizens – from participating in upcoming elections.
Coffee, macadamia nuts, bananas, papayas... Hawaii makes it easy to celebrate National Agriculture Day! Happy Ag day to the farmers, ranchers, and producers who nourish our state, the nation. and our economy with their safe, healthy, and delicious products!
Senate Republicans FINALLY accepted Senate Democrats' offer to fund TSA, FEMA, and the Coast Guard while we continue to negotiate common-sense guardrails for ICE. Trump blocked the deal. He's holding YOUR safety hostage to avoid reigning in ICE's lawlessness.
Putting untrained ICE agents at airports makes travel LESS safe while doing nothing to address the actual TSA crisis Trump has created by holding DHS hostage.   All because he refuses to rein in ICE's lawlessness. Despicable.   www.cnn.com/us/live-news...
It's hard not to laugh when my Republican colleagues talk about a lack of transparency or accountability in our government while refusing to look at Trump's laundry list of waste, fraud, and abuse.
Trump's war is costing American taxpayers almost $1 BILLION a DAY. $1 BILLION EVERY DAY. To put that into perspective: That's enough money to more than END homelessness in the state of Hawaii. Insanity.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Seven times. That's how many times Democrats have tried to fund TSA, FEMA, and the Coast Guard. And every single time, Republicans have refused. They would rather protect ICE's lawlessness than protect our communities. How despicable.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
772 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (58-33)
2025-06-18Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-18Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-18End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-46)
2025-06-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (68-30)
2025-06-17Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-17Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (57-40)
2025-06-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-06-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (46-39)
2025-06-16End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (44-33)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (67-30)
2025-06-12Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307)NONOMotion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Failed (45-52)
2025-06-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 54 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 53 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S. 1582 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-11End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-06-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-06-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (51-41)
2025-06-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (48-46)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 89NONOJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 87NONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 88NONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 55NONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 10 / 16Next →