PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes32%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @MartinHeinrichFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 247 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 18(source)
These are just a few of the messages I’ve received from New Mexicans about what the Republican plan to cut Medicaid would mean for them and their families. As their Senator, I will fight any cuts to Medicaid, especially when it's to fund tax breaks for billionaires.
"It's very scary when [Medicaid] is keeping you alive."
"Just this week I had to apply for Medicaid for my 96-year-old Mother. This is something I never thought I would have to do, but all of her assets have now gone to the nursing home where she resides, so she has nothing left. Freezes or cuts to Medicaid, as well as Social Security, would be devastating for her at this time. She requires 24-hour care, but if she doesn't receive Medicaid the nursing home will not allow her to stay. It was my understanding that Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare programs were protected by law. However; it appears that, even though Trump/Musk may not be able to "eliminate" these programs, they are definitely a threat to major cuts. I don't "scare" easily, but admit that this administration is frightening."
"Yet again the Republicans are threatening my daughter's life by attacking Medicaid. Heather has to have infusions for her chronic anemia. Due to multiple health issues, she is unable to work and must rely on Medicaid for health care. There are so many Americans in the same situation. Republicans just don't give a damn about any of them. Protect Medicaid!"
"My granddaughter is currently living in assisted living due to mental/physical disabilities. I am deeply concerned for her welfare and future with cuts being talked about by the new administration. Her mother died in 2000 and she is 27 years old, leaving myself, her only surviving relative, to make decisions and care for her. Without the assistance of various agencies this would have been impossible. Please let me know Christy can go on with her benefits unchallenged so she won't lose her quality of life."
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 18(source)
The heroic work of Navajo Code Talkers saved countless lives and was instrumental in Allied victory in World War II. Trump and Musk’s efforts to erase them from our history is disgusting and a slap in the face to every American who’s risked their lives for our freedom.
Navajo Code Talkers get "DEI" label as military info disappears under Trump order
Also vanishing: The Civil War regiment from "Glory," women pilots from WWII and a Medal of Honor winner.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 17(source)
Veterans make up 30 percent of our federal workforce. They deserve respect, not illegal terminations, demotions, and suspensions from a chainsaw-wielding, unelected billionaire. Proud to support the Putting Veterans First Act to show them the respect they are owed.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 14(source)
We’re in Congress to stand up for New Mexicans, and that’s why we voted “no” on the Continuing Resolution. When you confront a bully, you have to confront a bully, and we’ll keep doing that as long as Trump and Musk try to force their personal vendettas on our communities.
Republicans’ yearlong Continuing Resolution doubles down on the chaos and uncertainty Trump and Musk have created, giving them even more tools to harm New Mexicans. We will not stand by and support Republicans’ unprecedented power grab masquerading as a spending bill. As New Mexico’s senators, we want to see the federal government funded and functional, serving the families of our state. That’s why we have been fighting every day to force this administration to put the chainsaw down when it comes to the healthcare, education, and VA benefits our communities depend on. Instead, Republicans are giving Trump and Musk the tools to force their petty, personal vendettas on our communities – disregarding the needs of New Mexico families. That’s revenge politics and it is not how government should function. We are in Congress to stand up for New Mexicans. And that’s what we are doing now. For the people of New Mexico, we voted ‘no’ on Republicans’ Continuing Resolution.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 14(source)
My HALT Fentanyl Act passed the Senate and is a step closer to becoming law. It now heads to the House and I urge them to pass it, as it is urgently needed to help our law enforcement crack down on illegal trafficking, get deadly fentanyl out of our communities, and save lives.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 14(source)
Today in 1903, President Theodore Roosevelt established the first of what is now over 570 landscapes in our National Wildlife Refuge System. As it celebrates 122 years, Elon Musk is putting Roosevelt’s legacy at risk by hollowing out the workforce that stewards these islands of hope.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 13(source)
I had the honor of serving with Raúl Grijalva in the House of Representatives for four years. He was a fighter who was never deterred by slim odds or a hard road ahead and a tireless advocate for Arizona’s lands and wildlife and communities Washington left behind. My thoughts are with his family.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 13(source)
In case you thought your Social Security was safe from Trump, think again… nmpoliticalreport.com/2025/03/12/t...
“The president wanted it and I did it”: Recording reveals head of Social Security’s thoughts on DOGE and Trump - New Mexico Political Report
by Eli Hager ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox. Since the arrival of a team from Elon M...
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 13(source)
Had a chance to chat with Akilan Sankaran from Albuquerque, a top 40 finalist in this year’s Regeneron Science Talent Search–our nation’s oldest and most prestigious STEM competition for high school seniors. Congrats, Akilan!
Senator Martin Heinrich poses for a photo with Regeneron Science Talent Search Top 40 finalist Akilan Sankaran from Albuquerque.
Akilan Sankaran discussing his work with Senator Heinrich.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 11(source)
The Trump Administration’s war on the West continues. This will devastate gateway communities and leave our nation’s Crown Jewels unprotected and unmanaged. thehill.com/homenews/sta...
Trump administration eyes 30 percent payroll reduction at National Park Service
The Trump administration is eyeing a 30 percent payroll reduction at the National Park Service, signaling big cuts at a high-profile government agency that could make headlines during the summer va…
← Newer postsPosts page 32Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-10-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-10-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-39)
2025-10-22H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-21—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-10-21—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-10-21—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-10-21—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (66-32)
2025-10-20H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-43, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-16H.R. 4016 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-16—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-34)
2025-10-16H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-15H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-14H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (77-20, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (10-88, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (53-43, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (14-83, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-10-09H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (50-46)
2025-10-09H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-09H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (50-45)
2025-10-08S.J. Res. 83 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 83YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (48-51)
2025-10-08S.J. Res. 71 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Defeated (47-51)
2025-10-08H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-10-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-08H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-10-07H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-07S. Res. 412 (119th)Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-10-06S. Res. 412 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-10-06H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-42, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-06S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOT_VOTINGYES—Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03S. Res. 412 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Resolution Agreed to (51-46)
2025-10-01S. Res. 412 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-10-01—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-10-01—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-10-01H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-01S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Defeated (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Defeated (47-53, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 16Next →