Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 772
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 180 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byTina Smith
Sen. Tina Smith: "I don't know how I could vote for a funding bill for ICE and DHS when so much of what they are doing is illegal, is lawless."
School districts and day care centers across the Twin Cities are closing tomorrow because of fear of ICE and intimidation. Hear me loud and clear ICE: Stay the hell AWAY from our schools.
All they have to do is tell Bondi and Patel to let it happen. Takes one phone call. We all saw the videos with our own eyes. We all know their narrative isn’t true, no matter how much they want it to be.
If Trump and Vance were truly confident in their (false) narrative around the ICE killing in Minneapolis, they’d allow a joint investigation with state law enforcement.
Homeland Security’s description of what happened and the narrative they’re pushing clearly doesn’t match up with the videos we’re all seeing. They’re asking people not to believe what we can all see with our own eyes. I’ve been in contact with DHS demanding more information.
I want to express my deepest sympathy to the family and loved ones of the woman killed by ICE this morning. She should not have died today. This should not have happened. I can’t imagine the heartbreak you are going through and the grief you are enduring.
A US citizen has apparently been shot by ICE agents in Minneapolis. I’m gathering information, but the situation on the ground is volatile. ICE should leave now for everyone’s safety.
I’m aware of the reports of an ICE related shooting in Minneapolis and working as hard as I can to get answers. I’ll share any updates as I learn more.
Why won’t Speaker Johnson display this plaque thanking law enforcement for their heroic efforts to protect our Democracy on January 6?
Picture of a plaque honoring the law enforcement that protected the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
He can’t even grow the spine to put up a *commemorative plaque* honoring the police officers who protect him every single day. Add it to the laundry list of examples that prove he’s just Trump’s lap dog.
NEW: House Speaker Mike Johnson – after two years of deflecting questions on the matter – is now arguing that the legally-required January 6 plaque must be re-considered (more)
More masked ICE agents terrorizing our streets and arresting U.S. citizens will not make the Twin Cities safer (not that that was ever their goal)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
772 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-01-29H.R. 7148 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-55, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-27S. 3627 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-15H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (82-15)
2026-01-15H.R. 6938 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (85-14, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-14S.J. Res. 98 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 98YESYESPoint of Order Well Taken (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2026-01-13S.J. Res. 84 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-01-12H.R. 6938 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (80-13, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-08Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-40)
2026-01-08S.J. Res. 98 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 98NONOMotion to Discharge Agreed to (52-47)
2026-01-07S.J. Res. 86 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (43-50)
2026-01-06Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-48)
2026-01-06Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-01-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-35)
2025-12-18End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-42)
2025-12-18End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (60-35)
2025-12-18End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (58-36)
2025-12-18End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-12-18S. Res. 532 (119th)Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-12-18S.J. Res. 82 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 82NONOJoint Resolution Defeated (50-50)
2025-12-17S. Res. 412 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-12-17Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (71-29)
2025-12-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (69-27)
2025-12-17Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (67-30)
2025-12-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (67-30)
2025-12-17S. 1071 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESMotion Agreed to (77-20)
2025-12-15S. 1071 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-11S. 1071 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (75-22)
2025-12-11S. Res. 532 (119th)Resolution S.Res. 532YESYESResolution Agreed to (52-47)
2025-12-11S. 3385 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-11S. 3386 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-10S. Res. 532 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-12-10S.J. Res. 82 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-49)
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-12-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-46)
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-12-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-12-08End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-12-04Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (57-32)
2025-12-04S. Res. 520 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Rejected (43-37, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-04H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 131YESYESJoint Resolution Passed (49-45)
2025-12-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (63-34)
2025-12-03S.J. Res. 91 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (49-47)
2025-12-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (57-41)
2025-12-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (56-40)
2025-12-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (60-39)
2025-12-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (61-36)
2025-12-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-12-01End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-41)
2025-11-20H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 130YESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-43)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 16Next →