Eid Mubarak, Minnesota!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 180 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
$200B would’ve covered 6 years worth of ACA tax credits (yes, the same health care funding they shot down as too expensive)
They’d rather spend money on yet another unjustified war in the Middle East than health care for our own citizens.
Reposted byTina Smith
HASSAN: If a masked ICE agent kills an American citizen, should local law enforcement be allowed to investigate and hold that agent accountable?
MARKWAYNE MULLIN: Unfortunately, local law enforcement isn't supposed to be investigating federal
HASSAN: Your answer would make ICE unaccountable
Reposted byTina Smith
BREAKING: According to GasBuddy data, the national average price of gasoline- $3.86/gal- is now at its highest level since 2022.
The “SAVE America Act” would hand your private voter data over directly to the federal government.
Weird way to ‘secure’ our elections but a great way to consolidate power.
“We pinky promise to follow the laws we already have” isn’t going to cut it
Reposted byTina Smith
Health insurance should not cost more than your mortgage.
Reposted byTina Smith
The national average price of gasoline has reached $3.80/gal, according to GasBuddy, while diesel now sits at $5.03/gal. Americans today alone will spend $330 million more on gasoline than a month ago.
Reposted byTina Smith
There’s no money for your health care but they can afford to spend nearly a billion dollars a day on this war?
Minnesota once again ousting an architect of this Administration's evil mass deportation campaign just by showing what it looks like to love our neighbors.
Goodbye Greg Bovino.
No, this package won’t completely solve America’s housing crisis. But it takes a big step in the right direction, and I hope it builds momentum to keep going. There's always more to do, but this is a good step to make sure everyone has an affordable, safe place to call home.
But the bill can’t solely be focused on housing in one kind of community – it has to work for rural America, not just the suburbs and big cities. That’s why I pushed hard to get my bipartisan rural housing bill included.
The Senate just passed the first major housing supply legislation in nearly 30 years. The goal is simple: Build more homes to rent and buy, and drive down prices.
Reposted byTina Smith
$11.3 billion could cover any of the following for a full year:
-1.4 million people on Medicaid
-19 million kids getting free school lunches
-1.4 million people getting affordable housing
-1.1 million hungry seniors fed
-0.8 million children given free child care
116,000 Minnesotans lost health care coverage this year. Highest uninsured rate in almost ten years.
Fund health care. Not this war.
Reposted byTina Smith
There’s no such thing as too many people having access to healthcare. Everyone should have healthcare.
There are about a zillion problems with our health care system (and pretty much everyone across the political spectrum agrees on that!)
"Too many people have health insurance" is not one of said problems.
Reposted byTina Smith
The money Trump spent on the first 9 days of his war in Iran could have fully funded school breakfasts for nearly two years.
Reposted byTina Smith
Here's the truth:
Senate Republicans could pay our TSA agents and fund FEMA today. In fact, they could've funded it last week. @democrats.senate.gov brought a simple, clean bill that would fund these essential agencies while we keep negotiating on ICE and CBP.
Republicans blocked it.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-33) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-06-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (68-30) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-40) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-39) |
| 2025-06-16 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-33) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (45-52) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 54 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 53 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-41) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-41) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-38) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 89 | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 87 | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 88 | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-44) |
| 2025-05-21 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 55 | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | YES | YES | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | YES | YES | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.