PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
BlueskyFacebookInstagram
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 4(source)
Trump doesn’t give a damn about us, he only cares about billing us for his tax breaks for the richest of the rich. Screwing Minnesotans by putting us in the middle of a trade war with our *ally* is beyond insanity.
@NewsWire_US: Ontario's 25% export tax on electricity will affect 1.5 million homes in Minnesota, Michigan and New York ⚠ ONTARIO TO ISSUE 25% EXPORT TAX ON ELECTRICITY TO U.S.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 3(source)
Musk and Trump should have to face the hardworking Park Rangers they sacked. I’m bringing Kate, who was unjustly fired from northern Minnesota’s Voyageurs National Park, to the State of the Union.
Kate Severson, a federal park ranger at Voyageurs National Park in Minnesota. Severson was one of the thousands of newly-hired federal workers to be abruptly fired Friday, February 14, 2025, as part of the Trump administrations push to downsize the federal government.
Brilliant fall colors highlight this aerial view of Lake Kabetogama, one of four large lakes that make up Voyageurs National Park. Photo courtesy of Voyageurs National Park via MPR News
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 28(source)
That press conference was choreographed for an audience of one and he sits in Moscow. Once, we fought tyrants. Today Trump and Vance are bending America’s knee. And that weakens us.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 28(source)
Call out to all the Republicans who have posed for photo ops with Zelensky: Is today the day to finally speak out? Patriotism demands it.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 28(source)
Musk and DOGE are putting people’s lives and safety at risk — where are the Republicans ready to stand up and protect your constituents?
@EthanClarkWX: NWS has fired meteorologists as a direct result of upper-level heads telling them to do so. Let me be clear, people will die because of this. Absolutely insane.. I have no words for it. I’ve spent all day I mean all day in meetings with both republicans and democrats fighting.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 27(source)
The next time you hear Republicans mention tax cuts, ask yourself: For who? Because unless you’re in the top 5%, it’s probably not you.
Graph titled: trumps tax proposals cut taxes for the richest 5% while raising taxes for other groups.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 27(source)
This is corruption in plain sight. Musk is getting sweetheart deals for his companies, DOGE is helping him do it, and the President is cheering him on. This isn’t about government efficiency, but making him richer.
More Perfect Union
@moreperfectunion.bsky.social
Open post ↗
The FAA may cancel a $2.4 billion contract with Verizon and instead give it to Starlink, owned by Elon Musk, WaPo reports. This would be his latest opportunity to get richer off of taxpayers. Musk and his businesses have received $38 billion in federal contracts and subsidies.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 26(source)
Some more Minnesotans that have been screwed by Musk/Trump: * Forest Service worker who helps loggers sell timber * Veteran at the VA (who rooted out waste!) * Another veteran at the Small Business Administration who helped startups
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 25(source)
Let’s call this what it is: A closed-door meeting where Republicans huddle up and find out how they can give boatloads of our money to the richest among us and leave pennies for everyone else. They’ll pay for it by defunding Medicaid, which ~40% of kids rely on. The villains in any story book.
Ben Guggenheim (@ben_guggenheim): NEW: White House to begin hosting weekly tax discussions with congressional leadership -> Including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Speaker Mike Johnson, Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith and Finance Chair Mike Crapo
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 25(source)
How can you tell that Trump and Musk don’t actually care about going after waste and fraud? They just fired someone at the Minnesota VA whose job was to find waste/inefficiencies to save taxpayer money. It’s all a façade to shell out more money for billionaires and big corporations.
Reposted byTina Smith
The Washington Post@washingtonpost.comFeb 23(source)
Sharp cuts at the Department of Housing and Urban Development are likely to upend housing markets, make homes less affordable and roil mortgage transactions, according to current and former employees, contractors and housing experts.
HUD cuts expected to worsen America’s housing crisis, staffers say
The Department of Housing and Urban Development is expected to be slashed in half, according to an internal memo obtained by The Washington Post.
← Newer postsPosts page 56Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-04-22S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (98-0)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Ossoff Amdt. No. 4897)NONO✓Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Lujan Amdt. No. 4798)NONO✓Motion Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 4799)NONO✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22S.J. Res. 114 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 114NONO✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (46-51)
2026-04-21S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2026-04-20—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (47-46)
2026-04-16—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-04-16H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Passed (50-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-48)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 138 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 138NONO✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (36-63)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 32 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 32NONO✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (40-59)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 123 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 123NONO✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-52)
2026-04-14—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-04-14—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2026-04-14—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2026-04-13—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-03-26H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-26S. 1383 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-25S.J. Res. 103 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50)
2026-03-25H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-25S.J. Res. 107 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-24S.J. Res. 116 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 116NONO✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-24S. 1383 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24S. 1383 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24—Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2026-03-24—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (52-47)
2026-03-23—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2026-03-23—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2026-03-22—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-37)
2026-03-21S. 1383 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (41-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-21S. 1383 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Rejected (49-41, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-20H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Rejected (47-37, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-18S.J. Res. 118 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 118NONO✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-17S. 1383 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-48)
2026-03-17—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-03-17—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2026-03-12H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-12H.R. 6644 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (89-10)
2026-03-11H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (82-11, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-11H.R. 6644 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (84-10)
2026-03-10H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (89-9, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-10—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (71-29)
2026-03-09—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-28)
2026-03-05H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-04S.J. Res. 104 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 104NONO✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-04H.R. 6644 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2026-03-02H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-26—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (57-33)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 18Next →