Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 567
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 73 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I just rewatched William Wyler's Detective Story--it's based on a 1949 Sidney Kingsley play that ran for 15 months on Broadway with, insanely, a cast of 34. NY really needs an Encores series devoted to unrevivable plays, which this is, even though it basically invented the police-precinct TV drama.
Not one reporter in the room willing to ask to be treated with respect. Not one.
KAITLAN COLLINS: What would say to Epstein survivo--- TRUMP: You are so bad. You are the worst report. No wonder CNN has no ratings. She's a young woman. I don't think I've ever seen you smile. They should be ashamed of you.
Not to indulge in shameless book promotion, but...I interviewed Mr. Harnick about this for MIKE NICHOLS: A LIFE and I still laugh at his delightful answer. (What I couldn't convey in the text was that this was a phone conversation and someone--his wife?--in the background said, "Oh yes you were!")
"By the time he returned to New York, May's impulsive marriage was all but over--barely a blip in the memory of either party to it. (Asked more than fifty years later about the long-forgotten nuptials, Harnick said, 'Elaine and I were never married--well, yes, we were, my goodness! It was very unfortunate. She initiated divorce proceedings a couple of months later.")
Harry Haun has died at 85. In the world of New York theater, he was the last of his kind--a great old pad-and-pen reporter who'd interviewed everyone since John Wilkes Booth. At openings and events, he knew how to forage for an item, a line, an iota of news, and wouldn't let you go until he got it.
This is a fascinating, deeply researched and reported story that goes well beyond "Isn't A.I. terrible?" while keeping one foot firmly planted in "Yes it is."
In 1942, RKO slashed 43 minutes from Orson Welles's "The Magnificent Ambersons" and slapped on a happy ending. Now, an A.I. company wants to restore what was lost. Are they righting a historic wrong or descrating a classic? My deep dive, in this week's New Yorker. www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...
Just one more thing the miserable idiot took over, slapped his name on, and drove out of business in record time.
Trump: "I have determined that the fastest way to bring The Trump Kennedy Center to the highest level of Success, Beauty, and Grandeur, is to cease Entertainment Operations for an approximately two year period of time, with a scheduled Grand Reopening that will rival and surpass anything."
Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

After a one year review of The Trump Kennedy Center, that has taken place with Contractors, Musical Experts, Art Institutions, and other Advisors and Consultants, deciding between either Construction with Closure and Re-Opening or, Partial Construction while continuing Entertainment Operations through a much longer period of time, working in and around the Performances, I have determined that The Trump Kennedy Center, if temporarily closed for Construction, Revitalization, and Complete Rebuilding, can be, without question, the finest Performing Arts Facility of its kind, anywhere in the World. In other words, if we don’t close, the quality of Construction will not be nearly as good, and the time to completion, because of interruptions with Audiences from the many Events using the Facility, will be much longer. The temporary closure will produce a much faster and higher quality result!
 
Based on these findings, and totally subject to Board approval, I have determined that the fastest way to bring The Trump Kennedy Center to the highest level of Success, Beauty, and Grandeur, is to cease Entertainment Operations for an approximately two year period of time, with a scheduled Grand Reopening that will rival and surpass anything that has taken place with respect to such a Facility before.
 
Therefore, The Trump Kennedy Center will close on July 4th, 2026, in honor of the 250th Anniversary of our Country, whereupon we will simultaneously begin Construction of the new and spectacular Entertainment Complex. Financing is completed, and fully in place! This important decision, based on input from many Highly Respected Experts, will take a tired, broken, and dilapidated Center, one that has been in bad condition, both financially and structurally for many years, and turn it into a World Class Bastion of Arts, Music, and Entertainment, far better than it has ever been before. America will be very proud of its new and beautiful Landmark
I will happily berate Democratic leadership for the many things it could do but doesn't, but not for what is literally beyond its power to accomplish. Real restrictions on ICE with enforceability seem potentially within reach. That would not be nearly enough, but it would not be meaningless either.
We should keep fighting for the abolition of ICE because A) ICE should be abolished and B) It's important to push defunding onto the midterms agenda. But the truth is, these numbers are not high enough to enable a minority party to break a majority party at this moment. >
New poll — Abolishing ICE continues its historic surge of support. 46% support 43% oppose 80% of Democrats and 15% of Trump voters support abolishing ICE. Independents are +8 on the question.
New poll — Abolishing ICE continues its historic surge of support.

46% support
43% oppose

80% of Democrats and 15% of Trump voters support abolishing ICE.
Independents are +8 on the question.
I can't think of anything less useful than sitting here yelling "Don't be fooled by Trump's change in tone!" at each other. This is Bluesky. Who here is under the impression that this app is full of people who are easily fooled by Trump?
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
567 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 12Next →