Both JD Vance "it’s not going to be good" for Elon Musk if he doesn't crawl back & Donald Trump himself warning of "very serious consequences" are threatening Musk.
@karaswisher.bsky.social, how do you think it works out?
www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 17
Ro Khanna
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes41%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 17
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Ro Khanna
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 17
SoupScore
Ro's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 41 sponsored · 178 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I explain my thoughts in detail on why I voted to subpoena Elon Musk and how we can use this opportunity to block the Republican budget bill and stop chaotic economic policy -- rokhannausa.substack.com/p/why-i-vote...
I explain my thoughts in detail on why I voted to subpoena Elon Musk and how we can use this opportunity to block the Republican budget bill and stop chaotic economic policy — rokhannausa.substack.com/p/why-i-vote...
I explain my thoughts in detail on why I voted to subpoena Elon Musk and how we can use this opportunity to block the Republican budget bill and stop chaotic economic policy — rokhannausa.substack.com/p/why-i-vote...
Why I voted to subpoena Elon Musk and how we can use this opportunity to block the Republican budget bill and stop their chaotic economic policy rokhannausa.substack.com/p/why-i-vote...
I voted to subpoena Elon yesterday and believe he must be held accountable for the cruel and unconstitutional cuts to USAID and veterans' programs. But having him sidelined for '26 and speaking out against the Big Ugly bill will help in stopping Trump's cruel agenda.
And I took on my own party.
I ran against incumbents three times!
I endorsed @sanders.senate.gov & co chaired his campaign.
And I have called for competitive primaries even when we have an incumbent @davidhogg.bsky.social
I took on the Senate Parliamentarian.
Called her to be fired because she didn't allow raising the minimum wage.
I took on billionaires.
Called for raising taxes on billionaires even though no one represents an area with more billionaires in the world!
I took on the Defense Industrial complex.
Voted against every bloated defense budget in 9 years in Congress.
I took on Big Tech.
Introduced Internet Bill of Rights in 2017 & co sponsored Kids Online Act.
I took on Insurance.
Staunch supporter M4A & eliminating medical debt.
I took on Amazon.
@sanders.senate.gov & my No Bezos Act forced wages to $15.
I took on the Foreign Policy Blob. Passed the first War Powers Resolution re Yemen, stood against war in Iran.
I took on Wall Street.
Stops private equity buying single family homes.
I took on Big Oil.
Subpoenaed CEOs to testify under oath.
I took on Big Pharma.
Introduced a bill with @sanders.senate.gov & supported Trump's EO.
I took on defense contractors. Forced pay back of $16 million.
I was able to fight for people because I take no PAC or lobbyist money.
Trump's travel ban on citizens from over 12 countries is draconian and unconstitutional.
People have a right to seek asylum.
Reposted byRo Khanna
In 2 days Arizona Democrats can make history and be the first state party to commit to ban billionaires and corporations from buying our primary elections. If you’re done with big money corrupting our democracy, endorse our People’s Primary resolution at stopbigmoneyAZ.com.
It is sad that nearly 20 years later Republicans are still trying to gut the Affordable Care Act instead of working to guarantee healthcare for all Americans. The gulf between the political class and what people want has never been wider.
The GOP bill slashes Medicaid and food aid—while handing tax breaks to the ultra-rich. I challenged Republicans: keep modest cuts for the working & middle class, but scrap the $400K giveaway to the top 0.1%. Ending those breaks would cut over $1 trillion in deficits.
JD Vance says Roberts is profoundly wrong to call the Court a check on Congress & the Executive. He brags of being ‘inflammatory.’ When you call to defy even conservative jurists, you’re tearing apart our national allegiance to the Constitution.
www.wsj.com/opinion/vanc...
True or False: The American economy is rigged for the ultra wealthy with wealth piling up in a few places while most Americans struggle to afford a decent life- health, auto, & home insurance, groceries & childcare - on their paychecks.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.