Reposted bySenator Andy Kim
Anyone who believes Donald Trump’s corrupt scheme to take over the Fed is over is fooling themselves.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey
Andy Kim
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes31%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump wants a Fed Chair that will do his bidding.
He'll drop the bogus investigation into Powell but not Lisa Cook because it clears the path for Senate Republicans to confirm Kevin Warsh, Trump’s pick for Fed Chair.
You deserve a Fed that works for you, not Donald Trump.
I had a wonderful time meeting with the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities.
I learned about the work they do to expand access to higher education and strengthen workforce development.
I look forward to working with them to create opportunity for NJ students!
Today, I spoke to UsAgainstAlzheimer’s about the importance of investing in medical research that creates real breakthroughs.
I know first-hand how important this is as I watched my father who dedicated his life to curing Alzheimer's become afflicted with the disease himself.
When it comes to taking care of NJ seniors, I promise to stand with these organizations working on increasing affordable senior housing, combatting workforce shortages, protecting Medicare, and supporting care across the board whether it be nursing homes, home care, or community-based care. 2/2
It was great to meet with LeadingAge member organizations and service providers from NJ to hear about the issues that are impacting aging service providers. 1/2
Trump is spending billions of YOUR dollars on his war in Iran.
I asked you what you’d rather see your hard-earned money spent on.
Your answers were clear: care for your families and communities.
This is a choice: Fund Trump's lawless ICE and Border Patrol or redirect that money to what the people want – lower costs across the board.
To me, the choice is clear. I'll keep fighting through the night.
Reposted bySenator Andy Kim
Not only are Republicans trying to pass a budget resolution that does nothing to make things more affordable for Americans, they’ve also blocked my amendment to feed children, seniors, and veterans.
Reposted bySenator Andy Kim
You may have heard Republicans are pursuing something called a “reconciliation” bill.
Things can get a bit wonky, so let's simplify it.
Here's what Republicans want:
✅Billions upon billions more $ for ICE and CBP
❌Funding to help you afford health care, food, and housing
Reposted bySenator Andy Kim
Senate Republicans just voted NO on my amendment that said this reconciliation bill should have lowered out-of-pocket health care costs for the American people.
$140 Billion for ICE and Border Patrol.
$0 to lower your health care costs.
Reposted bySenator Andy Kim
BREAKING: @ossoff.senate.gov offered an amendment to prevent insurance companies from denying or delaying medically necessary health care.
Senate Republicans rejected it.
Reposted bySenator Andy Kim
Tonight, I put forward a very simple amendment: ensure no family pays more than 7% of their income on child care.
I gave my colleagues an opportunity to vote on lowering costs for hardworking American families.
Republicans voted it down.
Shame.
Firing the Secretary of the Navy while pursuing a naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz is yet another example of this administration’s recklessness.
They didn’t have a plan when they launched us into this war and they certainly don’t have one to get us out.
Checking in from the Capitol as Senate Republicans try to give tens of billions to ICE. I'll keep you updated throughout the night.
RFK Jr. claims to serve Americans with disabilities but I’ve heard from disability communities in my state. They don’t want this.
RFK Jr.'s funding cuts tell a devastating story. Actions speak louder...
It was great to meet with Governor Sherrill and the NJ Delegation in DC yesterday!
The federal/state partnership is so important when it comes to delivering for NJ, building an Einstein Corridor for innovation, and making our home the #1 place to live, work, and play.
Not another dime to ICE and CBP.
There’s been no reforms.
No accountability for the death of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.
No end to the lawlessness in our streets.
You deserve better.
At the State Department, I saw first-hand how our Afghan partners risked their lives to assist the United States and protect our servicemembers.
It is cruel and shameful that this administration would send these nationals to a country they’ve never been to where their safety is not guaranteed.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2026-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2026-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2026-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (58-39) |
| 2026-02-03 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-39) |
| 2026-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2026-02-03 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-44) |
| 2026-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2026-02-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (71-29, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-30 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 4287) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (58-42) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (58-42) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (67-33) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (32-67) |
| 2026-01-29 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-55, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-27 | S. 3627 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (82-15) |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (85-14, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-14 | S.J. Res. 98 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 98 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Well Taken (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2026-01-13 | S.J. Res. 84 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (80-13, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-40) |
| 2026-01-08 | S.J. Res. 98 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 98 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2026-01-07 | S.J. Res. 86 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (43-50) |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2026-01-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-35) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-36) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-12-18 | S. Res. 532 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-12-18 | S.J. Res. 82 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (50-50) |
| 2025-12-17 | S. Res. 412 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (71-29) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (69-27) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-30) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-12-17 | S. 1071 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion Agreed to (77-20) |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 1071 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. 1071 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (75-22) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. Res. 532 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. 3385 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. 3386 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-12-10 | S. Res. 532 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-12-10 | S.J. Res. 82 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-49) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.