Economy added only 22K jobs in August.
Not good.
Reminder that Trump once said “We need over 300K new jobs a month.”
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
More than 1,000 HHS workers are condemning RFK Jr.’s political purge of the CDC for putting families’ health at risk.
Ignoring proven science, firing experts, and stacking agencies with loyalists doesn’t keep anyone safe.
Our communities are safer when science leads the way, not conspiracies.
Reposted byMike Levin
RFK Jr. used his Senate hearing to double down on junk science.
Both parties called him out.
The facts are clear: vaccines save lives, conspiracies cost them.
America needs real public health leadership—not chaos.
RFK Jr. used his Senate hearing to double down on junk science.
Both parties called him out.
The facts are clear: vaccines save lives, conspiracies cost them.
America needs real public health leadership—not chaos.
Pocket rescissions aren’t just bad policy—they’re illegal and unconstitutional.
Congress controls the purse, not Trump’s Budget Director.
Even Senate Republicans are warning this power grab shreds Article I.
Time to defend the Constitution.
thehill.com/homenews/sen...
Courts are proving a vital check as we defend the rule of law.
Proud to serve on House Democrats’ Litigation Task Force, where we have filed a dozen amicus briefs and are winning in many cases.
Don't forget: Republicans claim they didn’t gut Medicaid—just added “accountability,” and that’s a LIE.
Their Big Ugly Bill slashes $1 trillion, imposes harsh red tape, and creates chaos that will push millions off their coverage.
All to fund a billionaire tax break.
Reposted byMike Levin
I implore my Republican colleagues to show a fraction of the courage we saw from Epstein’s survivors this morning: join the discharge petition, release the files.
I implore my Republican colleagues to show a fraction of the courage we saw from Epstein’s survivors this morning: join the discharge petition, release the files.
Trump’s Big Ugly Bill rips away Medicaid to pay for billionaire tax breaks.
Seniors risk losing care at home, kids with disabilities risk losing treatment, and working families risk losing stability.
Real lives are on the line if we don’t #StopCutsToHealthcare.
This move is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
It’s not a budget trick.
It’s a shameless abuse of power and a direct attack on the rule of law.
What’s at stake isn’t just $5 billion—it’s whether a president can rip away Congress’s most important power: the power of the purse.
A “pocket rescission” is when the President tries to run out the clock and let the money expire.
The Government Accountability Office has already said this is ILLEGAL. The Supreme Court has ruled that Presidents CANNOT cancel parts of laws on their own.
When Congress passes a budget, the President MUST spend the money as written.
If the President wants to cancel funds, he has to ASK Congress. If Congress says no or does nothing, the law says the money must be spent.
Trump’s budget director, Russell Vought, is trying to cancel about $5 BILLION in funding that Congress already approved using a scheme called “pocket rescission.”
Here’s the truth: 🧵
Our biggest class yet of Mike Levin For Congress interns just graduated! Huge thanks to our field team and to the interns for all of their hard work and dedication.
The military is not a political tool.
Federal law forbids using our troops as domestic law enforcement.
They deserve respect for their mission: defending America abroad, not being misused against Americans at home.
Trump’s budget director Russell Vought wants to shred the Constitution by handing Congress’s purse power to the White House.
It’s a full-blown assault on checks and balances.
I’ll always defend the Constitution and the freedoms it protects.
Reposted byMike Levin
Rising inequality, debt, tariffs, and Fed meddling are pushing America toward autocracy.
Too many leaders stay silent.
I won’t.
I’ll fight every day to defend our democracy, protect working families, and hold Trump accountable.
Rising inequality, debt, tariffs, and Fed meddling are pushing America toward autocracy.
Too many leaders stay silent.
I won’t.
I’ll fight every day to defend our democracy, protect working families, and hold Trump accountable.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.