Team Moore is celebrating the Brewers win! Congratulations to the entire team and. This city is so proud!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 616
Yes42%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 237 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
8 months. $47 billion. 21 American service members lives’ lost.
The cost of Trump’s war of choice in Iran is too high.
That’s how we do it, Milwaukee! ⚾️💙💛 World Series champions!!!
Congratulations to our Milwaukee Brewers on the win! There’s nothing like seeing our city come together, rally behind our team, and show the world what Milwaukee pride is all about.
Wisconsin has paid $1.45 BILLION more for gas since Trump started a war of choice 8 months ago.
That’s nearly $600 per household!
Money straight into Trump’s oil stock portfolio and the big oil donors who funded him.
Rest in Power, Dolores Huerta. As a fierce labor organizer and civil rights icon, our country is a better place because of her pioneering work.
“Every moment is an organizing opportunity, every person is a potential activist, every minute a chance to change the world.”
Today marks 8 months since Trump started his war of choice in Iran.
Since then nearly two dozen American service members have lost their lives, and hundreds have been injured.
When given a chance to end this war, Republicans in Congress like Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany & Derrick Van Orden voted NO.
Reminder: Wisconsin Republicans gutted BadgerCare to fund tax cuts for billionaires.
You can have your Golden Age back.
Trump and his allies in Congress like Tom Tiffany and Derrick Van Orden are the reason you’re paying more for everyday necessities.
Affordability 🤝 corruption
Thanks for the closing message, Donald.
Trump 2024: “I have concepts of a plan.”
GOP in 2025: *enact the deepest cuts to health care in American history.*
Tom Tiffany 2026: “l wish I could give you a comprehensive answer on health care.”
The Republican health care agenda, folks
I would think that my Republican colleagues Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, Derrick Van Orden, Tony Wied, Scott Fitzgerald and Glenn Grothman would condemn these increasingly desperate and deranged attempts by Trump to attack free and fair elections.
Or is this another Zuckerbucks thing?
This Thanksgiving you can pay record high airfare to see family and eat a meal that not only breaks the bank to get at the grocery store — but your food may or may not have undergone safety inspections because the guy in charge of the FDA eats road kill. #GoldenAge
Donald Trump is running a pay-to-play operation out of the Oval Office.
Corruption is running rampant, all while you pay more at the pump, more at the grocery store and more for health care all while Trump and his family are cashing in.
This is the most corrupt administration in American history, and the people see the fix is in and they are losing.
Trump and his GOP allies in Congress’s legacy is one of leaving everyday Americans sicker, hungrier and poorer while lining their own pockets.
I can confirm my district office in Milwaukee was one of several offices nationwide belonging to elected officials who received mail with a suspicious substance inside.
Congratulations to the Brewers for making it to the World Series! #ThisIsMyCrew
Thanks to Donald Trump and his war in Iran — rubber stamped by his allies in Congress like Tom Tiffany — inflation is soaring and everyday essentials are more expensive than ever.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History616 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
616 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.