We know you don't care, Scott. The same is true of the president and Republican members of Congress, who don’t represent DC.
This clip encapsulates why we need #DCStatehood: It’s the only way DC will permanently escape having policies it disagrees with being forced on its 700K+ residents.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|District of Columbia at-large
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 51
Yes10%
No77%
Present0%
Not Voting14%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
At-Large District
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Eleanor Holmes Norton
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratDistrict of Columbia at-large
SoupScore
Eleanor Holmes's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 91 sponsored · 956 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
If public safety were the goal instead of the pretext for seizing control of local DC resources, federal support would be directed towards violence prevention. Instead, troops are guarding monuments and the National Mall.
Lowering crime isn’t the goal here – control is.
More: bit.ly/41TuY2t
Reposted byCongresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC)
Washington DC’s 700,000+ residents deserve federal representation.
DC statehood now.
Notably, 8/10 people in DC oppose Trump's law enforcement surge and the unlawful federalization of MPD.
Trump's rhetoric characterizing DC as crime-ridden is contradicted by both the objective numbers and the subjective experience of DC residents, according to a new WaPo poll.
The number of residents who say crime is a serious problem dropped by 34% since last year.
Aiming to attend one of our nation's prestigious military service academies? Applications for nominations are due November 3.
We'll announce details about our in-person Service Academy Night event in the days to come. Stay tuned.
More: bit.ly/4lAjLek
After federal law enforcement were filmed in DC using excessive force, obscuring their own faces and refusing to identify their agency, @RepDonBeyer and I announced we'll reintroduce our bill requiring body and dashboard cameras when Congress returns.
More: bit.ly/3HHTrkA
When roving gangs of law enforcement conduct violent arrests, obscuring their faces and refusing to identify themselves, people eat out less.
The president's partisan political play is hurting real people, including workers and small business owners in the restaurant industry.
Attention DC middle and high school students: The annual Congressional App Challenge has begun!
Submissions must be created between October 24, 2024 and October 30, 2025.
Details here: bit.ly/3JsAKSp
DC pays the most in federal income taxes per capita in the nation, yet DC was excluded from a health program in the BBB, likely depriving the District of $100s of millions.
I introduced a bill to make DC eligible, the same way states are.
What makes DC’s ordeal this week even worse?
Trump is using DC as a stage and DC residents as props in a political play to distract from his Epstein problem.
This is unacceptable.
Reposted byCongresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC)
Trump seized control of DC to distract from the Epstein files. The political games must stop.
Today, House and Senate Democrats, led by Ranking Member Robert Garcia, introduced a resolution to put an end to Trump’s takeover of DC.
I was pleased to support DC's defense of home rule by attending today's hearing in the lawsuit DC filed against the Trump Administration.
Although DOJ rightfully restored control of MPD to DC Police Chief Smith, we must pass the legislation I introduced to end the unlawful federalization of MPD.
Jamie, thank you for your enduring support for DC.
Reposted byCongresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC)
Trump can't militarize the capital city to distract us from his refusal to release the Epstein file.
Today @eleanornorton.bsky.social, @robertgarcia.bsky.social, @vanhollen.senate.gov and I are introducing legislation to end Trump’s hostile and lawless takeover of D.C.’s police force.
I applaud DC for taking legal action to end the president's unlawful attempt to seize control of MPD.
On the same day DC is asserting its rights in court, I introduced legislation with my colleagues to end this egregious and unlawful federalization.
DC is united in our resistance.
No emergency exists in DC that the president did not create himself, and he is not using MPD for federal purposes, as required by law.
I introduced legislation with RM Raskin, RM Garcia, & Senator Van Hollen to end the unlawful and unprecedented federalization of MPD.
I love the spirit of DC. Its people are passionate, we are involved, and we speak up loudly when we've been wronged.
Nothing and no one can convince us we don't deserve all the rights and privileges of Americans who happen to live across a state line.
MPD is funded by local DC taxpayers. I will not allow a bill to progress that would force DC to fund a local police force for the president to use indefinitely. Rep. Ogles' bill is yet another extreme attack on DC home rule. This will not stand.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History51 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
51 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 2Next →