PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Jacky Rosen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Nevada
Born
August 2, 1957
Age 68
Phone
(202) 224-6244
Office
713 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada

Jacky Rosen

Jacklyn Sheryl Rosen is an American politician serving as the junior United States senator from Nevada since 2019. A member of the Democratic Party, she was the U.S. representative for Nevada's 3rd congressional district from 2017 to 2019.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes38%
No61%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align90%
Cross-party10%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenJackyRosenFacebookInstagram
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Jacky Rosen headshot
Jacky Rosen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Jacky's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 70 sponsored · 229 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted bySenator Jacky Rosen
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govDec 8(source)
Republicans have 2 choices: 1.) Let families keep tax breaks to afford health care 2.) Jack up health care costs for millions of Americans I know where I stand, and it’s on the side of making sure people don’t go bankrupt just to afford the care they need.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govDec 9(source)
Servicemembers should have access to all the resources they need to start and grow their families when and how they choose. This proves that anti-choice Republicans haven’t given up on trying to go after IVF, no matter what Trump says. Reproductive freedoms continue to be under attack.
Mike Johnson works in secret to strip IVF health coverage from defense bill
The speaker is working behind closed doors to remove a provision from the National Defense Authorization Act that would mandate health coverage for in vitro fertilization for all active duty military.
Reposted bySenator Jacky Rosen
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialDec 8(source)
Months after killing Democrats’ plan to extend tax credits that lower the cost of YOUR insurance, Republicans still have NO plan to prevent YOUR premiums from skyrocketing. While millions of Americans are about to see their costs increase, Republicans are twiddling their thumbs.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govDec 8(source)
Health care costs are too high, and I’m working to lower prices in any way I can. Proud to introduce a bipartisan bill to help lower the cost of prescription drugs and medical devices like insulin pumps, all while creating jobs.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govDec 5(source)
The Defense Department’s own Inspector General’s report shows Pete Hegseth mishandled classified strike plans on an unsecured messaging app & endangered our servicemembers.   He needs to resign or be impeached immediately.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govDec 4(source)
Next week, the Senate will vote on a “clean” extension of the ACA premium tax credits. This means the bill will only extend these cost-reducing tax credits for 3 years. That’s it. No other items will be added. Will Senate Republicans join us to make health care more affordable?
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govDec 3(source)
Nevadans are so proud to see our state represented at the U.S. Capitol – and some of the mayors who saw Silver Belle on its journey through Nevada have messages to share in honor of last night’s Christmas tree lighting:
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govDec 3(source)
Just in time for the holiday season, some of your favorite brands might be raising their prices because of Trump’s tariffs. When your gift budget is tighter this year, you’ll know exactly who to blame. I’ll keep fighting to reverse these cost-raising taxes. Read more:
Abercrombie & Fitch, Walmart, Nike, and other major brands that say Trump's tariffs are pushing them to raise prices
Trump's tariffs have companies scrambling as they navigate cost increases. Here are the companies that have talked about hiking prices.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govDec 2(source)
I’m encouraged to see my colleagues on both sides of the aisle calling for transparency, and as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee I’ll keep pushing to get to the bottom of this.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govDec 2(source)
If Secretary Hegseth gave a directive to “kill everybody” on boats in the Caribbean, which led to a second strike that killed incapacitated survivors, he may have committed a war crime.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govDec 1(source)
I was proud to help pass a law to allow Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices for seniors – and now, 15 additional medications will see lower prices in 2026 thanks to this law. As long as I’m in the Senate, I’ll keep fighting to lower costs and give Nevadans more breathing room.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govNov 30(source)
It’s Small Business Saturday! Nevada has so many incredible small businesses, and this holiday season is a great opportunity to shop local and support the stores and restaurants right here in our community.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govNov 27(source)
From my family to yours, happy Thanksgiving! Wishing everyone in Nevada and across the country a happy, healthy, and safe holiday spent with family and loved ones – and filled with good food!
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govNov 26(source)
Trump says he would “rather not” help millions of Americans afford health care coverage.   Democrats haven't stopped fighting to extend these tax credits, and we won't give up. If your health care costs spike, Trump will be to blame. He can prevent this by working with us.
NBC News
@nbcnews.com
Open post ↗
President Trump tells reporters that he doesn’t want to extend expiring subsidies under Obamacare, also known as the Affordable Care Act, delivering a major blow to prospects of averting sharp premium hikes next year.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govNov 23(source)
Trump and Washington Republicans bent over backwards to pass permanent massive tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy, but they’ve done nothing to lower grocery costs or prevent health care costs from spiking for your family.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govNov 23(source)
Our public health policy should be guided by science, not RFK Jr.’s conspiracy theories. Vaccines are safe and effective and have saved millions of lives, including by eradicating diseases like smallpox and polio. This is dangerous misinformation. abcnews.go.com/Health/cdc-w...
CDC webpage says link between autism and vaccines has been ignored, despite several studies finding no evidence
The CDC updated its webpage on autism and vaccines on Wednesday, promoting the debunked theory that the developmental disorder is caused by shots.
Senator Jacky Rosen@rosen.senate.govNov 21(source)
My casework team has helped thousands of Nevadans navigate issues with VA benefits, Social Security payments, immigration applications, and other federal agencies. If you need assistance, don’t hesitate to reach out. Click here for more information:
Help with a Federal Agency - Jacky Rosen
One of Senator Rosen’s most important responsibilities as a United States Senator is assisting Nevada residents with navigating federal agencies and identifying federal resources. Senator Rosen can he...
← Newer postsPosts page 31Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-04-22S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (98-0)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Ossoff Amdt. No. 4897)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Lujan Amdt. No. 4798)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 4799)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22S.J. Res. 114 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 114YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (46-51)
2026-04-21S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2026-04-20—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (47-46)
2026-04-16—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-04-16H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (50-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-48)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 138 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 138NOYES✕↔Motion to Discharge Rejected (36-63)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 32 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 32NOYES✕↔Motion to Discharge Rejected (40-59)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 123 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 123YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-52)
2026-04-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-04-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2026-04-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2026-04-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-03-26H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-26S. 1383 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-25S.J. Res. 103 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50)
2026-03-25H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-25S.J. Res. 107 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-24S.J. Res. 116 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 116YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-24S. 1383 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24S. 1383 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2026-03-24—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-47)
2026-03-23—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2026-03-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2026-03-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-37)
2026-03-21S. 1383 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Rejected (41-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-21S. 1383 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (49-41, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-20H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (47-37, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-18S.J. Res. 118 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 118YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-17S. 1383 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-48)
2026-03-17—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-03-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2026-03-12H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-12H.R. 6644 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (89-10)
2026-03-11H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (82-11, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-11H.R. 6644 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (84-10)
2026-03-10H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (89-9, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-10—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (71-29)
2026-03-09—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-28)
2026-03-05H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-04S.J. Res. 104 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 104YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-04H.R. 6644 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2026-03-02H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-26—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (57-33)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 18Next →