The same Republicans who were running for their lives on January 6 are now turning a blind eye to the President's lawlessness.
How did we get here?
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|California
Adam B. Schiff
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes29%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align93%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Adam B. Schiff
U.S. SenatorDemocratCalifornia
SoupScore
Adam B.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 56 sponsored · 307 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Even if Donald Trump's openness to defying the Constitution and denying due process doesn't surprise you, his ignorance of his oath of office should shock all of us.
A wise creature once said, "Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger; anger leads to hate; hate leads to suffering."
These days, when fear is all too common, today is a great moment to remember the strength in courage, unity... and hope.
May the 4th be with you. Always.
Donald Trump's memecoin is the equivalent of posting his Venmo on the internet.
Corruption in it's most obvious form. We need accountability.
No one embodies Donald Trump’s personal weaponization of the Justice Department more than Ed Martin.
More devastating cuts.
After calling gun violence a “mental health issue,” the Trump Administration just cut $1 billion in school mental health grants.
This decision will cost lives. I am fighting to restore this funding immediately.
No more thoughts and prayers - it's time for action on common sense gun safety legislation.
Tonight, a top ten list for you.
The top ten most corrupt acts of the Trump Administration — and how they affect you:
youtu.be/Wb_Jp9luj9w?...
The American people deserve to hear sworn testimony from every member of this administration's Signal chats.
Thanks to President Trump's latest nomination for UN Ambassador, the Senate will have a key member of those chats under oath in the very near future.
It took more than a month for Trump to hold anyone accountable for the Signalgate fiasco.
Next up should be Pete Hegseth.
Yesterday, I introduced legislation to ban assault weapons.
It's common sense. It will save lives. And it's long overdue.
The next constitutional crisis may come from Trump’s abuse of a federal law enforcement agency you may never have heard of.
Let's talk about the U.S. Marshals Service, and why they are so central in preserving our democracy.
youtu.be/My2Moji9sCk?...
The time to act is now.
I'm introducing the Assault Weapons Ban Act of 2025.
The time to act is now.
I'm introducing the Assault Weapons Ban Act of 2025.
100 days of chaos, confusion, and higher costs.
Let's break it all down:
youtu.be/8rnbY7VrkjI?...
Slashing the Department of Education will cause harm to our students.
College will be more expensive. K-12 will have less resources for special ed. Research into cures will be slashed.
I’m standing with our students. And fighting for the future.
This Trump Corruption List is nowhere near comprehensive. That's exactly the problem.
I'm going to continue doing everything I can, every single day to rein in this corrupt president. And dangerous Administration.
I know you will, too.
#1 - The Memecoin
Trump's memecoin is the most egregious, and most lucrative example of political corruption in modern history.
In fees alone, Trump has seen hundreds of millions of dollars flow into his personal bank account including money from foreign interests looking to buy influence.
#2 - The DOJ as Personal Attorneys
He hired his top criminal lawyers to lead the department. The result?
Cases against Trump allies dropped.
Investigations into critics launched.
The DOJ under Trump hasn't just been politicized — it has been weaponized to reward loyalty and punish dissent.
#3 - Picking Apart the Law Firms
Trump publicly threatened law firms which employed lawyers or represented clients he didn’t like, chilled legal opposition to his policies, and extorted hundreds of millions in free legal work for his pet causes.
A literal racket.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History789 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
789 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 16 / 16