This National Coming Out Day, we remind all of our LGBTQ+ neighbors, friends and loved ones that we support who they are — exactly how they are.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|California
Adam B. Schiff
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 915
Yes31%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align93%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Adam B. Schiff
U.S. SenatorDemocratCalifornia
SoupScore
Adam B.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 101 sponsored · 380 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
We went from sanctioning Russian oil to buying it in three weeks.
Instead of ending his disastrous war in Iran, Trump is now funding Russia's war in Ukraine.
We used to hold dictators and autocrats accountable.
Now our president negotiated a deal to fund Putin's unjust war.
We have to put an end to it, and hold those responsible, accountable.
Yesterday in New York, ICE agents shot yet another person. This time, while his on 5-year-old child was in the same car.
From coast to coast, ICE's brutality continues to traumatize our communities.
This administration is using your tax dollars to implement their violent anti-immigrant agenda. 🧵
This brave whistleblower has exposed another dangerous abuse of power.
The FBI was ordered to investigate Californians exercising their First Amendment rights.
Ordered by the Trump White House.
And federal resources were diverted from cases involving drug trafficking and violent crime in order to further the administration’s cruel agenda.
They hope to deter Latino citizens from voting with these awful tactics.
They must not succeed.
A father dropping his daughter off at college.
Dozens more Californians separated from their families.
This administration is not done pushing their destructive immigration agenda, backed by court-allowed racial profiling, and utilizing ICE agents armed to the teeth by your tax dollars.
A Trump White House energy adviser helped override state law and court orders to restart an old and dormant pipeline on the Central Coast responsible for one of the state’s worst oil spills.
Now she’s a top executive for the company that owns the pipeline.
I hope for the sake of our sailors, Marines, soldiers, guardians and airmen that this new deployment of Californians does not repeat the hardships of the Abraham Lincoln.
Only last week, the USS Theodore Roosevelt and its carrier strike group left San Diego. All signs point to its crew being relief for a beleaguered force still deployed in the Middle East.
Not just for the sake of the higher costs this war has imposed on the American people, but for the sake of those servicemembers who have paid an even higher price. Those who have been asked to miss holidays, birthdays, births and weddings for nearly a year in order to sustain this war of choice.
As we welcome them home today, and we hear more of those stories of hardship and sacrifice, I hope these heavy burdens resonate through the halls of the White House and the Pentagon. With no clear objective and no measurable progress, this war must end.
The crew of the Abraham Lincoln has faced long and grueling shifts, diminished supplies and even mental health crises. Those burdens of such a long deployment have been shouldered by the crew and their families back in San Diego.
In the time these men and women were deployed as the tip of the spear in the Iran war, they worked tirelessly. And that service took a heavy toll – a price we have come to know through harrowing stories shared by family members and even the military's own leadership.
And today, for the first time in 10 months, they return home. They hug loved ones. They sleep out of harm's way.
321 days.
That's how long the USS Abraham Lincoln and its thousands of servicemembers have been away from their families and their home port of San Diego.
@padilla.senate.gov, @carbajal.house.gov, and I are investigating the legality of this ethically dubious career change that’s a trademark example of this administration’s corrupt relationship with the oil industry.
A Trump White House energy adviser helped override state law and court orders to restart an old and dormant pipeline on the Central Coast responsible for one of the state’s worst oil spills.
Now she’s a top executive for the company that owns the pipeline.
With the support of the White House and both sides of the aisle, and from the unions and the moviemakers who deliver the magic to our theaters, I am hopeful we can finally get this done.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History915 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
915 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (47-41) |
| 2026-09-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2026-09-30 | H.R. 9340 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (57-43, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-30 | H.R. 7008 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-29 | S. Res. 852 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 852 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-51) |
| 2026-09-29 | S.J. Res. 197 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-51) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (77-22) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-54, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (1-94) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (96-1) |
| 2026-09-24 | H. Con. Res. 89 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Amendment Agreed to (77-23) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (74-25, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2026-09-22 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (70-21, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-45) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2026-09-17 | S. 4668 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (77-22) |
| 2026-09-15 | S. 4668 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (74-24, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-09-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-46) |
| 2026-08-08 | S. 5271 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Table Agreed to (61-32) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
| 2026-07-28 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-07-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2026-07-23 | S.J. Res. 180 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 19Next →