Again and again, the federal government refuses to force the Upper Basin to put cuts on the table and entertains scenarios that would devastate Arizona.
It is a total failure of leadership.
...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Arizona District 4
Greg Stanton
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes47%
No50%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align95%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Stanton
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratArizona District 4
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 27 sponsored · 98 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Full statement copy:
Solving the Colorado River crisis for the long term demands a fair, workable, basin-wide solution where every state has skin in the game. What we got today is the opposite.
...
I’ll never stop fighting to protect Arizona’s water, our economy, and our future. My full statement on today's announcement is here.
We need to conserve the river, protect water levels, and boost funding for projects that reduce our reliance on it.
I’ll keep fighting to deliver on all that and more, because Arizona can't be forced to carry this alone.
President Trump, the Interior Department, and the Bureau of Reclamation need to work with us to build an effective 7-state agreement based on today's reality, not century-old politics.
That’s why I helped lead a bipartisan coalition with Rep. Dina Titus calling on congressional leaders to attach drought resilience funding to the next funding deal.
That is the bare minimum to help protect water access for the 40 million Americans who rely on the river.
Those investments are making a difference, but record heat and drought have left the Colorado River at its lowest levels on record
Congress needs to treat this like the emergency it is.
That’s why I helped secure $4 billion for Western drought relief in the Inflation Reduction Act, including $154 million for the SRP-CAP interconnect, $107 million for the Gila River Indian Community, and water purification for Phoenix and Tucson.
On top of that, I’ve fought to secure Tribal water settlements that bring certainty to our Native communities and downstream partners.
Every gallon recycled is one we don't need from the river — but there’s a long way to go before our communities can thrive without it.
I've secured tens of millions in federal funding for local water projects — treatment and conveyance in Chandler, smart meters to conserve supply, line replacements in Phoenix, and reopening Tempe's Kyrene Reclamation Facility.
This month, I secured another $151 million for the program in the bipartisan Water Resources Development Act, bringing the total over $400 million once it is signed into law.
Over a dozen AZEI projects are currently under construction.
In my first term in Congress, I created Arizona's Environmental Infrastructure Authority Program so our communities could build efficient and resilient water systems to reduce dependence on the river.
I worked to conserve our water usage as Mayor, and I’ve continued to protect the river and defend our water rights in Washington.
Arizona has done the work. We use less water today than we did 50 years ago, even after decades of incredible growth. We recycle more water than almost anyone. We made hard cuts early, before anyone forced us to.
We warned what deep cuts would mean for communities down river, including for Tribes, for our farms, and for our chip industry.
We saw this coming. Back in March, I led Arizona's congressional Democrats in telling the Bureau of Reclamation that none of the alternatives in their draft plan were workable for our state.
The new federal framework for Colorado River operations fails to recognize today's reality.
The river is in crisis, and AZ has the most to lose. No state has done more to prepare for difficult years ahead than ours. Here's the record the Interior Dept. left out and what Congress needs to do.
🧵
Withholding these funds is not only wrong, it's likely illegal. This is Trump's mass deportation regime in action.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
Congress created special protections for kids fleeing trafficking, abuse, and violence — including funding for legal counsel — so their cases could be heard fairly.
Now, 20,000 children are at risk of standing in a courtroom alone facing deportation.
I was proud to host Taiwanese Legislator Wang An-Hsiang and Deputy Director of Foreign Affairs Renno Liao at our historic state capitol.
Arizona's partnership with Taiwan runs deep. I was glad to discuss how we can strengthen that relationship and stand up for our shared democratic values.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | H. Res. 1399 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-30 | H. Con. Res. 108 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-30 | H. Res. 1398 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-30 | H. Res. 1398 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-29 | H.R. 7128 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-29 | H.R. 7757 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-06-25 | H.R. 2478 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-24 | H.R. 915 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-24 | H.R. 7401 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-23 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-23 | S. 629 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-11 | H. Res. 1335 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-11 | H.R. 9238 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 8464 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 8464 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 8312 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 7892 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H.R. 5408 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1140 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | S. 2 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1140 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1345 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1345 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-08 | H.R. 8428 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-08 | H.R. 8466 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-05 | H.R. 2913 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 518 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H.R. 8646 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H.R. 8646 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 1336 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 1336 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Con. Res. 84 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 518 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7726 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7726 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 2860 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 1333 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 1333 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | S. 254 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7618 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 6047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1041 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1041 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1329 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1329 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1300 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1300 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 2616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 12Next →