PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Elizabeth Warren headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Massachusetts
Born
June 22, 1949
Age 76
Phone
(202) 224-4543
Office
311 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts

Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth Ann Warren is an American politician and former law professor who is the senior United States senator from the state of Massachusetts, serving since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party and regarded as a progressive, Warren has focused on consumer protection, equitable economic opportunity, and the social safety net while in the Senate. Warren was a candidate in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, ultimately finishing third after Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 788
Yes25%
No74%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenWarrenFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Elizabeth Warren headshot
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Elizabeth's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 68 sponsored · 295 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Tammy Duckworth@duckworth.senate.govSep 17(source)
NEWS: SASC Democrats and I are officially calling on Chair Wicker to hold on a hearing on Donald Trump's ongoing military deployments to cities across the country. Our nation's servicemembers and the American people deserve transparency.
A letter led by combat Veteran and U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—a member of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC)—that is co-signed by her fellow SASC Democratic colleagues, urging Committee Chairman Wicker to hold a hearing with Department of Defense (DoD) leadership in order to evaluate Donald Trump’s ongoing military deployments to American cities and his efforts to redirect DoD resources away from core military missions to support the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and his authoritarian enforcement efforts.
A letter led by combat Veteran and U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—a member of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC)—that is co-signed by her fellow SASC Democratic colleagues, urging Committee Chairman Wicker to hold a hearing with Department of Defense (DoD) leadership in order to evaluate Donald Trump’s ongoing military deployments to American cities and his efforts to redirect DoD resources away from core military missions to support the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and his authoritarian enforcement efforts.
A letter led by combat Veteran and U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—a member of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC)—that is co-signed by her fellow SASC Democratic colleagues, urging Committee Chairman Wicker to hold a hearing with Department of Defense (DoD) leadership in order to evaluate Donald Trump’s ongoing military deployments to American cities and his efforts to redirect DoD resources away from core military missions to support the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and his authoritarian enforcement efforts.
Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.govSep 17(source)
Researchers at @umasschan.bsky.social were finding cures to childhood cancer — then Trump brought that work to a halt. That’s who Trump’s hurting. Little kids with cancer.
Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.govSep 16(source)
Today's the day: Your taxpayer dollars are now being used to fix up a “free” plane Qatar “gifted” to Donald Trump. Up to $1 BILLION going to a plane that Trump's planning on keeping after he leaves office. So much for getting rid of waste, fraud, and abuse.
Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.govSep 16(source)
In 2022, Democrats in Congress passed a simple law: corporations that make over $1 billion a year must pay at least 15% of their profits in taxes. Now, the Trump Administration is adding loopholes to let these companies off the hook. It’s disgraceful.
Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.govSep 16(source)
Under Donald Trump’s economy: Coffee is up 26% Beef is up 14% Oranges are up 17% Bananas are up 6% Chicken is up 6% Chocolate Chip Cookies are up 5% Potato Chips are up 4% Milk is up 4% But average worker pay is only up 2% Trumpflation is eating up your paycheck.
Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.govSep 16(source)
We're in a health care emergency. Republicans in Congress gutted Medicaid, and now, nursing homes, community clinics, and hospitals are closing. Health insurance premiums are skyrocketing and people risk going bankrupt without coverage. Congress must fix this crisis RIGHT NOW.
Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.govSep 16(source)
The courts keep rejecting Donald Trump’s illegal attempt to take over the Fed so he can scapegoat away his failure to lower costs for American families. If the courts – including the Supreme Court – continue to uphold the law, Lisa Cook will keep her seat as a Fed Governor.
Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.govSep 16(source)
Tonight, Republicans are voting to confirm Trump's chief economic advisor to the Federal Reserve Board, despite his refusal to resign from the White House. This is an unprecedented and unacceptable conflict of interest—and American families will pay the price with higher costs.
Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.govSep 15(source)
The Trump Administration is cashing in on foreign crypto deals — and weakening guardrails that protect our advanced technology. We should not pass any crypto legislation without shutting this down.
Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.govSep 15(source)
Donald Trump promised he'd lower grocery prices. Today, almost all grocery products are more expensive than they were a year ago. His tariffs are hiking prices and hurting American families.
← Newer postsPosts page 56Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
788 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05—Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (5-94)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48)
2025-04-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-04-03S.J. Res. 26 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26YESNO✕Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83)
2025-04-03S.J. Res. 33 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33YESNO✕Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82)
2025-04-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-04-03H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (53-42)
2025-04-02H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-02S.J. Res. 37 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-48)
2025-04-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-04-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-01—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-03-31—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2025-03-27—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-03-27—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-03-27S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-48)
2025-03-26S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (70-28)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-26—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-03-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-26—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-03-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (56-44)
2025-03-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44)
2025-03-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-03-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-03-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (74-25)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 16Next →