S.J. Res. 26 (119th)Bill Overview

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to Israel of certain defense articles and services.

International Affairs|International Affairs
Cosponsors
Support
Independent
Introduced
Feb 25, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageFloor

Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 15 - 83. Record Vote Number: 166. (consideration: CR S2152-2158)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The joint resolution would prohibit a specific proposed foreign military sale to Israel described in Transmittal No. 24–13.

The sale items include thousands of guided and unguided bomb bodies, JDAM guidance kits, fuzes, supporting components, spare parts, and U.S. government and contractor logistics and technical services.

The resolution uses congressional disapproval authority under the Arms Export Control Act to block that transaction.

Passage15/100

Narrow but highly controversial disapproval of allied arms sale faces strong institutional and political obstacles.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention78/100

Human-rights and civilian protection emphasis versus deterrence concerns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersAsserts congressional oversight over specific foreign military sales, clarifying legislative check on executive arms tr…
  • Targeted stakeholdersPrevents transfer of specific precision munitions that supporters may link to civilian harm concerns.
  • Targeted stakeholdersReduces U.S. provision of items used in long-range strike, potentially lowering immediate Israeli precision-strike capa…
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay strain U.S.-Israel defense cooperation and interoperability on munitions and targeting systems.
  • Targeted stakeholdersLikely reduces export revenues for U.S. defense contractors supplying those munitions and support services.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould lead to job losses in manufacturing, logistics, and contractor support depending on contract timing.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Human-rights and civilian protection emphasis versus deterrence concerns
Progressive90%

Likely supportive of the resolution as a means to limit U.S. arms transfers tied to civilian harm concerns and human rights oversight.

Views congressional disapproval as appropriate accountability when weapons might be used in ways that endanger civilians.

May see the move as leverage for diplomatic pressure toward de-escalation and humanitarian protections.

Leans supportive
Centrist50%

Mixed view: supports congressional oversight but worries about strategic and alliance implications.

Sees value in review and potential restrictions if clear misuse is documented.

Prefers calibrated measures, diplomatic engagement, and clear contingencies to avoid unintended security gaps or credibility loss.

Split reaction
Conservative5%

Likely strongly opposed, viewing the resolution as undermining a key ally’s security and politicizing arms transfers.

Frames the prohibition as weakening deterrence against adversaries and diminishing U.S. strategic reliability.

Sees limited benefits and significant security and diplomatic risks.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood15/100

Narrow but highly controversial disapproval of allied arms sale faces strong institutional and political obstacles.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Executive branch position and likely veto threat
  • Committee and floor amendment activity
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

SENATE · Apr 3, 2025

Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83)

15 yes · 83 no · 1 present

On the Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26

Yes 15% No 84% Present 1%
Against party line
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Human-rights and civilian protection emphasis versus deterrence concerns

Narrow but highly controversial disapproval of allied arms sale faces strong institutional and political obstacles.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis