Motion to table the motion to reconsider the vote by which S.J. Res. 49 failed of passage (Record Vote No. 225) agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 49. Record Vote Number: 2…
This resolution would, if enacted, end the national emergency the President declared on April 2, 2025 to support global tariffs. It invokes Congress's authority under the National Emergencies Act to terminate a declared emergency. Ending that emergency would remove the special legal authority tied to the declaration that was being used to impose those tariffs. The resolution is a lawmaking measure that must be enacted to take effect.
As a joint resolution, it must be passed by both the House and the Senate and then be presented to the President. It becomes law if the President signs it, or only if Congress overrides a presidential veto with the required two-thirds votes in both chambers.
This joint resolution would terminate the national emergency declared on April 2, 2025 (Executive Order 14257) that authorized imposition of global tariffs, effective on enactment, pursuant to section 202 of the National Emergencies Act.
Narrow and implementable but politically charged reversal of executive action; procedural obstacles and potential executive opposition lower odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is concise and legally specific about its primary action — terminating the named national emergency under the National Emergencies Act — but it provides minimal ancillary detail.
Progressives emphasize restoring congressional authority and consumer protection.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize restoring congressional authority and consumer protection.
Likely supportive because it checks executive emergency power and reduces broad tariff impacts on consumers and supply chains.
May nonetheless want protections for workers affected by increased foreign competition.
Cautiously favorable: supports rebalancing separation of powers but wants replacement, targeted policy, and assessment of economic impacts before termination.
Likely opposed or skeptical because terminating removes a policy tool for protecting domestic industry and national-security trade levers; some conservatives may agree if focused on limiting executive overreach.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow and implementable but politically charged reversal of executive action; procedural obstacles and potential executive opposition lower odds.
The motion was tabled — set aside indefinitely without a vote on its merits.
Tabling a motion effectively kills it without debate.
The Senate rejected this resolution. It does not carry the official position of the chamber.
A resolution is a formal statement or decision by the chamber. Simple resolutions apply only to one chamber; joint resolutions require both chambers.
Progressives emphasize restoring congressional authority and consumer protection.
Narrow and implementable but politically charged reversal of executive action; procedural obstacles and potential executive opposition lowe…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is concise and legally specific about its primary action — terminating the named national emergency under the National Emergencies Act — but it provides minimal…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.