
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Angela D. Alsobrooks
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 782
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 222 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
1 in 10 Marylanders work for the federal government. They’ve raised their hands to work for the American people.
Trump’s callous and foolish witch hunt isn’t just upending the lives of these great Marylanders, but the lives of countless Americans who rely on the work they do.
The damage in Western Maryland is devastating, and residents are still suffering the consequences. Thus far, the Trump Admin has done nothing.
The federal government is supposed to stand up for all Americans in times of crisis. No matter whether they're in a blue or red state.
The fact that there hasn’t already been an investigation into the Americans who have been killed is unacceptable.
Sayfollah Kamel Musallet should be alive today.
I joined my colleagues in demanding accountability.
May we all continue to pray for peace in the region.
Jordan McNair would be 26 today.
We must honor his memory by passing the Jordan McNair Student Athlete Heat Fatality Prevention Act to finally ensure student athletes are protected, and college athletic programs implement heat illness emergency action plans.
Honored to join the National Black Prosecutors Foundation Conference.
Being a domestic violence prosecutor and later State's Attorney were some of the most fulfilling experiences of my life.
Thank you to the NBPA and its members - the keepers of justice in an unjust society.
I met with Cameron Grove seniors, all of whom expressed anger at this callous Administration and its obsession with harming working people.
I told them what I tell every Marylander - I’m in this fight for you.
Glad to meet with IBEW Local 26!
Maryland’s economic success depends on robust federal support, protected labor standards, and expanded access to apprenticeship and training programs that create good-paying jobs.
I will always be a champion for labor rights.
This Fibroid Awareness Month, we are getting to work.
After generations of pain, those impacted by this disease shouldn't have to keep suffering in silence. I will keep fighting for our health.
I spent this morning with Calvert County educators hearing not only about their successes but also their real concerns about how federal funding losses will impact their students.
Education is the great equalizer, and I’ll always stand up for our students and their teachers.
My office loved mentoring Annicha for Girls Inc.’s Take Our Daughters to Congress Day.
Annicha is a Marylander from Washington County, and I was so glad to speak with her and hear her interests.
Our future is looking good in the hands of Annicha and all the girls of Girls Inc.
5 years ago we lost an American hero, but the spirit of John Lewis will live on forever.
I felt John with me as I marched across the Edmund Pettus Bridge this year, the same bridge he marched on Bloody Sunday - courageously marching for voting rights.
We will keep marching.
Republicans are at it again—trying to jam another bill through the Senate to make things worse for the American people.
I'm working with Lupita Nyong'o and my colleagues to pass the U-FIGHT Act and invest in fibroid research.
80% of women suffer from fibroids, and Black women are disproportionately impacted.
But only 8% of research dollars goes to women's health care. That needs to change.
Safety and economic viability remain at the forefront of Team Maryland’s strategy.
I joined Mayor Scott, Sen. Van Hollen, and Congressmen Mfume and Olszewski today to discuss how we will work to bring down crime, lower costs, and fight back against this callous president.
Trump’s witch hunt continues.
To the Maryland patriots who’ve spent their lives working on behalf of this country — I will keep fighting for you.
Firing people committed to American national interests, diplomacy, peacemaking, and human rights will have dire consequences.
It was an absolute honor and privilege to join tens of thousands of my Sorors of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. from across the nation for our 57th National Convention!
In this current climate, our foundation of social action is so critical. We persist with fortitude.
I am praying for those in Baltimore impacted by this mass overdose incident.
I want to thank state and local leaders as well as city health officials for their tireless work these past 24 hours to save lives.
We must keep fighting to get these drugs out of our communities.
The Trump Administration must keep the Economic Development Administration open. Full stop.
The work the EDA does is absolutely critical: assisting during natural disasters, creating tens of thousands of jobs, and attracting billions in private investment.
Once again, Maryland is feeling the devastating impacts of this Administration’s opposition to science and progress.
The NIH is the crown jewel of all medical research organizations in the world – we must continue to invest in the lifesaving work they do. www.wbaltv.com/article/pati...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History782 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
782 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (81-15) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (21-75) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (15-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.