Collaboration at all levels of government is how we deliver for the people we work for. That's why I'm grateful for partners like Milwaukee Mayor Johnson. Great to see him today to talk about our work to lower housing costs and keep Milwaukee a great place to live and work.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin
Tammy Baldwin
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 900
Yes31%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 52 sponsored · 327 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The President is openly talking about sending armed troops to our polling places. This is not about safety; it is about trying to intimidate voters and tip the scales in the midterm elections. My new bill would stop him in his tracks.
www.jsonline.com/story/news/p...
Spreading baseless lies and threatening to send ICE to our election sites won’t make our elections any safer — it will just intimidate eligible voters from voting. The President’s efforts to meddle and intimidate voters need to stop now.
Republicans’ war in Iran has been a double whammy for our farmers. Not only is it more expensive for them to run their machinery and grow crops, but getting those crops to market is costing more too. They need relief from this chaos. www.jsonline.com/story/news/l...
Wisconsin elections are secure and your votes are counted thanks to our local election officials. While the Trump Administration continues to spread lies and meddle in their work, it was great to meet with Dane County election workers who keep our elections safe and free.
Happy Hispanic Heritage Month! This marks a time to celebrate the culture, tradition, and contributions of the Hispanic Americans who make our state and country stronger.
This is outrageous. This funding should go towards whatever research that will get us cures for diseases and medical breakthroughs – not for the president to take and spend however he wants. www.nytimes.com/2026/09/20/s...
I hope everyone observing Yom Kippur has a meaningful and easy fast!
15 years ago, we told our service members they can live their lives as their true, authentic selves when we ended the discriminatory Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. Today reminds us of what’s possible when we don’t let our differences divide us but instead unite us.
The president is serious about trying to meddle in our elections by sending armed federal agents to our polling places this November.
I’m serious about stopping this.
We need to pass my bill to prevent this from happening.
The president has already tried to cut staff and funding from research to find cures for cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and other illnesses.
The last thing we need is him to inject more of his politics into this work and slow down these scientists even more.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Our nation’s veterans know the true cost of war better than anyone. We’ve already lost 18 U.S. servicemembers to Trump’s war of choice in Iran. Today, I joined Wisconsin veterans to call for an end to this war.
Your money – that’s meant to find cures for cancer and diseases – is being swiped by this administration and given to Pete Hegseth.
Walmart and Amazon are hiding Made in America products from customers when they are looking for them. That’s wrong, and it needs to change.
We should be doing everything we can to support American manufacturing and businesses, not undermine them.
www.wsj.com/cmo-today/se...
Wisconsinites asked for lower gas prices.
Donald Trump delivered the opposite.
Apparently, there's no money for your healthcare or childcare, but we have $40 billion of taxpayer dollars for Trump’s war of choice in Iran.
That is $2,179 that Wisconsinites could be using on groceries, child care, or saving for a trip.
How much do Wisconsinites need to suffer before this President stops this chaos?
www.jsonline.com/story/money/...
Trump’s effort to stop Americans from voting by mail – despite many Wisconsinites already receiving their ballots – is unconstitutional, plain and simple. The Supreme Court needs to protect Americans’ right to vote and tell the president no.
apnews.com/article/trum...
Deploying federal agents to local polling places won’t make our elections any safer.
But what it will do is cause chaos and stop eligible voters from casting their ballots.
We can’t let that happen.
These last few weeks, I’ve traveled to every corner of Wisconsin and heard how Donald Trump’s chaotic tariffs and war in Iran have made it harder for small businesses to make ends meet. It’s clear they need relief, now.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History900 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
900 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2026-02-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-02-12 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-47) |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-02-10 | S.J. Res. 95 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51) |
| 2026-02-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2026-02-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2026-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2026-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2026-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2026-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2026-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (58-39) |
| 2026-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-39) |
| 2026-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2026-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-44) |
| 2026-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2026-02-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (71-29, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-30 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 4287) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (58-42) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (58-42) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (67-33) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (32-67) |
| 2026-01-29 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-55, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-27 | S. 3627 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (82-15) |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (85-14, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-14 | S.J. Res. 98 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 98 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Well Taken (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2026-01-13 | S.J. Res. 84 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (80-13, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-40) |
| 2026-01-08 | S.J. Res. 98 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 98 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2026-01-07 | S.J. Res. 86 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (43-50) |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2026-01-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-35) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-36) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-12-18 | S. Res. 532 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-12-18 | S.J. Res. 82 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (50-50) |
| 2025-12-17 | S. Res. 412 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (71-29) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (69-27) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.