Suzanne Bonamici headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oregon District 1
Born
October 14, 1954
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-0855
Office
2231 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Oregon District 1

Suzanne Bonamici

Suzanne Marie Bonamici is an American lawyer and politician serving as the U.S. representative for Oregon's 1st congressional district, a seat she was first elected to in a 2012 special election. The district includes most of Portland west of the Willamette River, along with most of Portland's western suburbs such as Beaverton, Hillsboro, Tigard, and Lake Oswego.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 569
Yes40%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Suzanne Bonamici headshot
Suzanne Bonamici
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOregon District 1
SoupScore
Suzanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 58 sponsored · 271 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

HUD is turning its back on the American people. They fired two civil rights lawyers for raising concerns about the lack of Fair Housing Act enforcement. Now HUD is blaming Democrats for the government shutdown, even though Republicans are in charge of the Administration, House, and Senate.
It's absurd that Trump is spending an expected $3.8 million to deploy the National Guard to Portland, especially during a government shutdown and when families are struggling to pay for health care, housing, and groceries. What would you rather do with $3.8 million?
The number of federal troops needed in Portland is ZERO. Donald Trump is using taxpayer dollars to manufacture a crisis. If he really wanted to help Oregon, he would reverse cuts to Medicaid and support funding for housing and education.
Let’s show them what Portland is and stands for; a vibrant community full of people who care about each other and our city and are working to make Portland a great place to live and work.
I am in Portland almost every day and in no way is it “War ravaged.” We do not want or need federal troops in Portland. The Trump administration is using lies and delusions  to try to justify turning the military against US citizens. It’s illegal, dangerous, and outrageous.
We are now hearing rumors that the Trump Administration may be increasing federal forces in Portland. The power of this city is in our ability to care for our neighbors. Please take care of each other, stay safe, and stay peaceful. Don't take Trump's bait.
We were not satisfied with their answers and many questions remain. Today we held a press conference to call draw attention to some of the egregious cases, to question their tactics, and to continue advocating for safety, due process, and the protection of civil and human rights.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
569 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-05-12H.R. 2853 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-05-12H.R. 2071 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-04-30S. 4465 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-30S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-29S. 1318 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-29H. Res. 1224 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-29H. Res. 1224 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-27H.R. 227 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-27H.R. 7959 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-23H.R. 5587 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1182 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-21S. 1020 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 2493 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 5201 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-20H.R. 5200 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-20H.R. 1681 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 1156 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 1689 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 965 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-16H. Con. Res. 40 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-04-15H. Res. 965 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 7613 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 1011 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 12Next →