Veronica Escobar headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Texas District 16
Born
September 15, 1969
Age 56
Phone
(202) 225-4831
Office
2448 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 16

Veronica Escobar

Voting Record — 594
Yes42%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 16

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Veronica Escobar headshot
Veronica Escobar
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 16
SoupScore
Veronica's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 19 sponsored · 69 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Today, in what should have been a 9-0 vote, the Supreme Court didn’t just make the right decision, they made the only constitutional decision. Birthright citizenship has been fundamental to our nation’s economy, culture, and identity for more than 150 years.
A budget and what we choose to fund is a statement of our priorities.   Republicans prioritize billionaires, Democrats prioritize people who've fallen on hard times or need a little bit more help feeding their families.
Finally, it's important to remember that Republicans pushed through these cuts to  fund tax breaks for billionaires.   They decided it was more important to give billionaires *more* government handouts than help the people who really need it.
There are people who want to work but don't have the infrastructure or support - like reliable transportation - to do so.   Others who were previously receiving food assistance don't find out they're no longer eligible until the last minute, sending them scrambling.
Republicans also removed some income deductions that were previously allowed, like the cost of internet and utilities.   Republicans eliminated exemptions for veterans, people experiencing homelessness and young adults aging out of foster care. thehill.com/homenews/adm...
As part of the One Big Beautiful Bill, Republicans cut nearly $200 billion in funding used to feed people under the guise of rooting out waste, fraud and abuse.   At a time when Americans continue struggling under higher costs, Republicans chose to make it worse.
A year after slashing a monstrous amount of funding for SNAP, Republicans will point to declining enrollment numbers for the program and call it "a success."   Here's why it's anything but, unless your goal is to increase the number of people going hungry...   🧵
My bipartisan immigration reform bill, the Dignity Act, creates a pathway to citizenship for them.

I call on my colleagues in Congress to join me and Rep. Salazar to help fix DACA and other broken parts of our immigration system once and for all.
It's been 14 years since DACA was enacted. I think about all the young people who’ve since graduated with degrees, started families, advanced in their careers, paid taxes, and loved the only country many of them have ever called home and more.
Budgets reflect our priorities. This bill puts billions more toward an approach that has already raised serious questions about rampant abuse, lack of oversight, and effectiveness while completely ignoring the needs of the American people. I strongly oppose it.
At a time when families are struggling with higher costs and programs they rely on are being cut, Congress should be investing in affordable housing, health care, infrastructure, and support for working families—not writing another blank check to reckless agencies with no guardrails attached.
In communities like El Paso, we've already seen how that money is being spent: on massive detention facilities, no-bid contracts, and warehouses being converted into immigrant detention centers while serious concerns about oversight, conditions, and accountability remain.
Republicans are asking taxpayers to hand ICE and CBP another $70 billion, even though the Department of Homeland Security still has roughly $100 billion from the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill.” I voted NO. 🧵
Contractors conducted health screenings at intake, but did not follow up with comprehensive health assessments for detainees. As a result, detainees with chronic conditions did not receive treatment and care in accordance with National Detention Standards.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
594 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-06-30H. Res. 1399 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-06-30H. Con. Res. 108 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-06-30H. Res. 1398 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-06-30H. Res. 1398 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-06-29H.R. 7128 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-29H.R. 7757 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-06-25H.R. 2478 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-24H.R. 915 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-24H.R. 7401 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-23H.R. 6644 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2026-06-23S. 629 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-11H. Res. 1335 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-06-11H.R. 9238 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOFailed
2026-06-10H.R. 8464 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-06-10H.R. 8464 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-06-10H.R. 8312 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-06-10H.R. 7892 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-06-09H.R. 5408 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-09H. Res. 1140 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-06-09S. 2 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-06-09S. 2 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2026-06-09H. Res. 1140 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-06-09H. Res. 1345 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-06-09H. Res. 1345 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-06-08H.R. 8428 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-08H.R. 8466 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-05H.R. 2913 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-04H. Res. 518 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-06-04H.R. 8646 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-06-04H.R. 8646 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-06-04H. Res. 1336 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-06-04H. Res. 1336 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-06-04H. Con. Res. 84 (119th)Approve resolutionYESNOFailed
2026-06-03H. Res. 518 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-06-03H. Con. Res. 86 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-06-03H.R. 7726 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-06-03H.R. 7726 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-06-03H.R. 2860 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-03H. Res. 1333 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-06-03H. Res. 1333 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-06-03S. 254 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-03H.R. 7618 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-21H.R. 6047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-05-21H.R. 1041 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-05-21H.R. 1041 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-05-21H.R. 1329 (119th)Final passageNONOFailed
2026-05-21H.R. 1329 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-05-20H. Res. 1300 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-05-20H. Res. 1300 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-05-20H.R. 2616 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 12Next →