Happening soon! Join in person or watch live on Facebook: Facebook.com/CongressmanBillFoster
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Illinois District 11
Bill Foster
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 614
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 11
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Bill Foster
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratIllinois District 11
SoupScore
Bill's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 36 sponsored · 60 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Now is the time for Republicans to do what they know is right: speak out and join Democrats to take action to stop this administration before this war of choice spirals further out of control.
A president's words carry real consequences, and they should be used to de-escalate conflict, not push us closer to the brink. This is precisely why our Founding Fathers gave Congress the authority to declare war, rather than any single power-crazed individual.
The President of the United States openly threatening to wipe out an entire civilization is nauseating and un-American.
Happy Easter! Wishing all who celebrate a joyful day spent with loved ones.
Reminder! I'm hosting a town hall at McHenry County College next Wednesday, April 8th, at 7:00 p.m. CT.
For more information and to register, visit foster.house.gov/townhall.
Wishing all who celebrate a joyful and peaceful Passover. Chag Pesach Sameach!
It's been one year since "Liberation Day," where Trump announced his illegal tariffs. Since then, the U.S. has lost 89,000 manufacturing jobs and families have paid an extra $1,700.
Yet another one of Trump's failed economic policies.
Pam Bondi's tenure as AG has been a disgrace. Good riddance.
Our fight for transparency and accountability on the Epstein files doesn't end here.
Trump’s incompetence is putting the lives of American servicemembers in danger and risking another prolonged entanglement in the Middle East. (5/5)
Strikes on nuclear facilities are not the same as eliminating fissile material, and do not provide the same assurances as international safeguards—like we had in the Iran Nuclear Deal. (4/5)
To date, the administration has not made a compelling case to Congress to address Iran’s existing stockpile of 60 percent enriched uranium—which is all that Iran needs to build several Hiroshima-style bombs. (3/5)
Last June, following their strikes on Fordow, the Trump Administration declared that they had "obliterated" Iran’s nuclear program. That was not a technically credible assessment then, and the fact that they are continuing to justify military action in Iran on nuclear grounds makes that clear. (2/5)
As Congress’ only Ph.D. physicist, I am particularly concerned about the nuclear considerations in Trump’s Iran war. (1/5)
And they’re off! Wishing the Artemis II crew a safe and successful journey. 🚀
Despite recently voting by mail himself, Trump wants to make it harder for you to do the same.
Mail-in voting is secure. This is just another attempt at voter suppression by a president who knows how deeply unpopular he is.
Some more photos from #NoKings this past weekend!
To pay for Trump's war in Iran, House Republicans are considering even MORE cuts to health care.
Americans want affordable health care—not another endless war in the Middle East.
www.axios.com/2026/03/30/g...
As Women's History Month draws to a close, it was great to talk with three inspiring female leaders from our community this past weekend about their personal journeys and ideas for the future.
You can watch the full recording on my YouTube channel: youtu.be/dacqWghQ2C4
Proud to stand with so many of you in Romeoville, Bolingbrook, and Naperville today for #NoKings. The peaceful protests across Illinois and the country are a powerful reminder that democracy is worth defending.
No kings in America. Not now, not ever. 🇺🇸
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History614 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
614 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | PRESENT | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.