Jimmy Gomez headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 34
Born
November 25, 1974
Age 51
Phone
(202) 225-6235
Office
506 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 34

Jimmy Gomez

Jimmy Gomez is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 34th congressional district since 2017. His district includes the Los Angeles neighborhoods of Eagle Rock, Boyle Heights, Downtown Los Angeles, Koreatown, and other communities. A member of the Democratic Party, Gomez served in the California State Assembly from 2012 to 2017.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 497
Yes37%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 34

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jimmy Gomez headshot
Jimmy Gomez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 34
SoupScore
Jimmy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 15 sponsored · 80 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Republicans used to talk a big game about free markets and accountability. Now? If Donald Trump says jump, they ask how high. No questions, no scrutiny, no backbone. Right now, Americans can tell they’re not getting the full story… and they don’t trust it.
Republicans are trying to pull a sleight of hand Americans while our country is worse off than ever before. 90K+ jobs lost in a single month, gas prices through the roof, and the national debt has now surpassed $39 TRILLION. You can’t ignore reality. Americans are going to say enough is enough.
Watch the guy supposedly “skilled in reading people” attempt to fight a witness in the middle of a Senate hearing. Oh yeah, and Republicans just made him our new Secretary of Homeland Security.
Rep. Pete Sessions: "Markwayne is a person who may not be skilled in all the policy aspects, but he's skilled in reading people"
Donald Trump told Americans to send our sons and daughters to war, but won’t tell us why. If he wants our service members to put their lives on the line, the least he owes us is the truth.
Donald Trump told Americans to send our sons and daughters to war, but won’t tell us why. If he wants our service members to put their lives on the line, the least he owes us is the truth.
People are really suffering, and if this war continues, it’s about to get worse. Donald Trump promised to lower costs on day one. Instead, working families are paying more for everything, and getting squeezed from every direction.
If Iran really was an "imminent threat," then why won't they say if they agree with Trump when he claimed Iran was 2 weeks away of obtaining a nuclear weapon?
Republicans Senator John Kennedy just admitted on Fox News that the Senate was prepared to fund TSA and end their shutdown, but Trump said no. Next time someone blames Democrats for the chaos unfolding at our airports, show them this clip.
Sending untrained ICE agents into America's airports won't solve the problem Republicans started, it'll make things much worse. Republicans hold the House, Senate, and White House. This shutdown is on them. Instead of causing more chaos, they need to work with Democrats to fund TSA.
ICE agents aren't trained to run airport security, yet Trump wants to drop them into crowded terminals and hoping nothing goes wrong. We’ve already seen what happens when agents are put in situations they’re not trained for: things escalate fast, and American citizens pay the prices.
Like millions of Americans across the country, Angelenos see Trump's war with Iran for exactly what it is: a middle finger to working families, a distraction from the Epstein Files, and a complete war of choice.
If North Korea isn’t considered an imminent threat, why is Iran? The Department of Defense says Iran is still about a decade away from having a missile that can reach the U.S. Meanwhile, Tulsi Gabbard, testified that North Korea has those capabilities today.
Pete Hegseth tried to shut out reporters instead of answering for his disastrous decisions. A federal judge today ruled it unconstitutional. If you can’t handle basic accountability, you shouldn’t be anywhere near the Pentagon.
A judge has ruled that a Pentagon policy limiting independent press access is unlawful, dealing a major blow to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's push for tighter media control. https://cnn.it/47g5dwa
Why didn’t intel chief, Tulsi Gabbard, agree with Trump that Iran was an ‘imminent threat’? Because she couldn’t say it without lying through her teeth. We’ve seen what happens when administration officials tell the truth and it doesn’t match Trump’s narrative, they’re silenced, fired, or ruined.
If Trump can ignore intelligence and decide for himself what counts as an “imminent threat”… What stops him from declaring China a threat, against the evidence, and launching a preemptive strike?
Yes or No? Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard refused to give a straight answer on her own past statement that “Iran was not building a nuclear weapon.” If she can’t be honest about what she herself said, how can we trust her to give honest intelligence to the American people?
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
497 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 5764 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-20H.R. 5763 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYESAgreed to
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2312 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2270 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Final passageNONOFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6504 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6500 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-12H.R. 2683 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-09H.R. 5184 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 1834 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H. Res. 780 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 131 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 504 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Divisions B and CYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Division AYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 780 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-06Call of the HousePRESENTPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 10Next →