Val T. Hoyle headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oregon District 4
Born
1964
Age 62
Phone
(202) 225-6416
Office
1620 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Oregon District 4

Val T. Hoyle

Voting Record — 497
Yes41%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 4

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Val T. Hoyle headshot
Val T. Hoyle
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOregon District 4
SoupScore
Val T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 56 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Today, my colleague @replamonica.bsky.social is in court on trumped up charges that she acted improperly while exercising her constitutional & statutory duty to provide oversight at ICE facilities. If this administration thinks they will scare & silence us, they're wrong. I stand with Rep. McIver.
Republicans cut Medicaid by $1 trillion in their budget bill. Now they want to let ACA subsidies expire for 24 million Americans. The impending Republican health care crisis is going to hit us all, that's why Republicans must come back to the table to help us fix the mess they've created.
House Republicans are now using the shutdown that THEY STARTED to justify not swearing in a duly elected Democratic Representative.   Why?   Maybe because she'll be the final signature we need to release Epstein files. There is no excuse for playing with people's health care to protect pedophiles.
Today is #LatinaEqualPayDay, the day when Latina pay catches up to what White men made last year alone. That’s $0.54 to $1. A union contract is how we start to close the wage gap so Latina women get the equal pay, dignity and respect they deserve.
I am grateful to @agdanrayfield.bsky.social & his team for standing up for our state. This reaffirms what we have always known: the Administration’s lies about Portland do not reflect the reality on the ground. This paragraph from the Trump-appointed judge makes it clear what’s at stake here.
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Federal judge temporarily blocks the Trump administration from deploying the National Guard in Portland, Oregon.
President Trump is doubling down because he wants to see how far he can take this illegal militarization. This is just the next boundary he is hoping to cross without pushback. Now is the time to speak up so this doesn’t end in every major American city under military occupation.
Leavitt: "President Trump will end the radical left's reign of terror in Portland once and for all. The president has directed Secretary Hegseth to provide all necessary troops to protect war-ravaged Portland."
1) This is incredibly racist.   2) He is referring to EMTALA, a Reagan-era law that requires a hospital to provide life-saving care, regardless of your ability to pay.   3) Does VP Vance prefer we just let stroke victims die in our waiting rooms because they can’t speak & verify their status?
Vance: "If you're an American citizen & you've been to the hospital in the last few years, you've probably noticed wait times are especially large & very often somebody who's there in the ER is an illegal alien. Why do those people get healthcare benefits at hospitals paid for by American citizens?"
On top of EJ Antoni liking Nazi warships, running a creepy anonymous Twitter account and being at the Capitol on January 6th, he was not remotely qualified to run the Bureau of Labor Statistics. His nomination being pulled is a win for all working people.
Our military is not trained for de-escalation or peacekeeping, they are trained to kill efficiently. We should not be sending them into our cities to police civilians. Not only does this go against the Posse Comitatus Act, it will only escalate tensions.
This whole time, Republicans told us they didn't want our input, ideas, or votes. Now that they've failed to keep government open, it's suddenly our fault? Keep the same energy or come to the table and negotiate. You know where to find us.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
497 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 10Next →