Their app, Relink, uses AI and location-based tools to connect formerly incarcerated individuals with second-chance employers, housing options, and critical support services. 2/3
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 16
Sam T. Liccardo
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes44%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 16
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Sam T. Liccardo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 16
SoupScore
Sam T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 44 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Congratulations to Shreyas Chatterjee, Shrehan Chatterjee, and Saumit Korada—the winners of the 2025 Congressional App Challenge in our district. 1/3
I invite the Secretary to come to Silicon Valley and see firsthand how this Administration’s policies raise costs on working families.
youtu.be/yTwWyzbcnCA?...
I voted against the two-week extension in ICE funding.
We took our fight straight to ICE headquarters—raising our voices in unison: Kristi Noem must go!
For the sake of our country and our global economy, I sincerely hope that Warsh shows his spine, rather than a supine posture we see too often in this Administration. 4/4
While Warsh has long held strong views about the Fed’s critical role in battling inflation with tighter monetary supply, he seems to have abandoned those principles in recent months, as this opportunity emerged. 3/4
If confirmed, Kevin Warsh must answer to the Federal Reserve’s mandate, not the President’s. 2/4
Global financial stability depends on an independent Federal Reserve. Over the past year, President Trump has worked relentlessly to undermine that independence—drawing ire and concern from experts across the ideological spectrum. 1/4
www.wsj.com/economy/cent...
We won’t stand for ICE inflicting chaos and cruelty in our communities.
Semiconductors are sexy again – and drive our economic future. I’m proud to have secured more than $1 million for San José State University to train the next generation of electrical engineers who will help America win the 21st century.
blogs.sjsu.edu/newsroom/202...
In the bills that the House approved, our district received more than $14 million for local projects supporting housing affordability and public safety. 2/2
sanjosespotlight.com/congressman-...
The cracks in the armor are widening. For the first time in this 119th Congressional session, Republicans actually sat down with Democrats to craft appropriations bills–instead of bulldozing us to a shutdown. 1/2
We have to end this national nightmare. The first step is holding those in charge accountable.
Specifically, I would remind Secretary Noem and every ICE official that there is a 5 year statute of limitations for criminal indictment under federal law. 4/4
After repeatedly calling for Noem’s resignation, I have now signed onto articles of impeachment, because removing her comprises the first step toward restoring law and order in this country. There must be more. 3/4
Noem and her accomplices have unleashed brutality in the service of political ambition, killing American citizens, locking up 5 year-old children, and terrorizing our communities. This conduct warrants independent, criminal investigations of everyone involved, including Secretary Noem herself. 2/4
As a former federal prosecutor and mayor, I worked with law enforcement every day–courageous women and men who put service above self. What we see now isn’t law enforcement—it’s lawlessness. 1/4
I'm fighting to impeach Secretary Kristi Noem.
youtu.be/aw_Qo9q2bPc?...
Shoutout to Palo Alto High School student Maya for using her baking talents to give back to our community. Since last summer, Maya has been whipping up sweet treats for Doggie Protective Services events in Palo Alto—and has already raised $2,300 to support their work. Thank you, Maya!🐾🍪
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.