Trump wants ICE to keep killing people.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 2
James P. McGovern
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 612
Yes40%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 2
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

James P. McGovern
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 2
SoupScore
James P.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 36 sponsored · 223 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
A young dad with a toddler in the backseat.
A father of 3 on his way to work.
A mom who had dropped her 6-year-old son off at school.
A VA nurse helping a woman pushed down by masked federal agents.
Enough is enough. Abolish ICE.
Washington lets billionaires write the tax code. Republicans give them one blank check after another without a care in the world. But when it comes to funding our veterans’ hard-earned benefits, MAGA starts pinching pennies. Enough already!
What the hell does this have to do with the State Department?
Another day in America, another father, mother, son, or daughter shot and killed by ICE—a result of the nearly unlimited funding signed into law by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans.
Guess I hurt his feelings
Susan Collins voted to supercharge ICE funding, and the best she can do is politely call the DHS Secretary and ask him to stop killing her own constituents.
VFW, our nation’s top veteran advocacy group, called out MAGA for trying to cut veterans benefits for disabled veterans.
The response from House Republicans has been one of the most disgraceful and cowardly things I’ve ever seen.
The International Criminal Court exists to provide justice to victims when countries can’t or won’t. By trying to destroy it, Trump and Rubio seek to give themselves—alongside Putin, Netanyahu, Maduro, annd other human rights abusers—impunity for war crimes committed under their orders.
You just voted to give these thugs another $70 Billion. You’re complicit in this and every other murder committed by Trump’s secret police.
You mean like when you discussed war plans in your easily-hackable Signal group chat?
By the way—we’re still waiting on that refund for Trump’s illegal tariffs.
I am leading 80 Members of Congress urging Secretary Mullin to extend protections for Salvadoran TPS holders. Ending TPS for El Salvador would hurt our economy, tear apart families, and send 200,000 lawfully present Salvadorans back to a country where they face potential human rights abuses.
At a packed town hall in Racine, Wisconsin this week hosted by @WeAct4progress.bsky.social talking about how to build a better future. Folks are sick of a status quo built for billionaires & corporate greed. If Republicans are too afraid to listen to their constituents—we’ll do their job for them.
ICE is using the same playbook of lies & propaganda for Lorenzo Salgado Araujo as it did for Renee Goode & Alex Pretti. I support the demands of the Salgado family for a full & transparent investigation. You are not alone and we will stand with you to demand justice & accountability.
Reposted byRep. Jim McGovern
Thanks, @repmcgovern.bsky.social, for cosponsoring the LIFT the BAR Act, urgent and important legislation to lower barriers to health and economic security for millions in immigrant families. Massachusetts organizations can support this critical reform at pifcoalition.org.
People know the status quo has failed them time and time again.
Big change is coming.
Still the wrong files.
These days, it’s incredibly rare for Washington to do anything that helps people. This bipartisan affordable housing bill is one of the few very rare exceptions, but Trump won’t sign it unless Congress lets him rig the midterm elections.
He’s ALWAYS putting himself above the American People.
Republicans gave these thugs a $170 BILLION slush fund to keep doing this shit.
Abolish ICE NOW!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History612 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
612 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.