Gregory W. Meeks headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New York District 5
Born
September 25, 1953
Age 72
Phone
(202) 225-3461
Office
2310 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 5

Gregory W. Meeks

Gregory Weldon Meeks is an American lawyer and politician who has been a U.S. representative from New York since 1998. He is a member of the Democratic Party and chaired the House Committee on Foreign Affairs from 2021 to 2023. He still sits on the committee as ranking member. He is also the chair of the Queens County Democratic Party.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes40%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 5

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Gregory W. Meeks headshot
Gregory W. Meeks
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 5
SoupScore
Gregory W.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 82 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Republicans are plotting to pass the Trump-House budget which rips off Americans by cutting essential services for seniors & veterans such as Medicaid, food assistance, & more. I will continue fighting to prevent extremists from stealing your taxpayer dollars for their own gain. youtu.be/wHrFmsM07a8
This is a major threat to our health care in our country. Americans deserve an HHS Secretary who is led by science and evidence and is committed to public health. That is not Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...
What are they looking for and who are they?! An unelected oligarch with no security clearance should not be accessing Americans’ most confidential information. Musk must be stopped. Democrats introduced the Taxpayer Data Protection Act to do just that. youtu.be/hJF4aFM-MVk
Elon Musk is not a government employee. He is a private citizen. So why is Trump granting Musk & friends access to Americans' most private information like Social Security numbers, and taxpayer data? This isn't efficiency, it's a dangerous government takeover. apnews.com/article/dona...
Today marks 85 years since the first social security check was issued. The Social Security Act continues to provide an essential financial safety net for millions of people. It’s critical we continue to protect the earned benefits of Americans.
DEI programs were implemented to give Americans of all backgrounds a fair opportunity to serve our nation. DEI programs have proven to improve innovation, changing our workforce for the better. Implementing an executive order to rescind these programs is un-American and shameful.
🚨FYI: President-elect Trump recently announced that Monday’s Inauguration Ceremony will be moved indoors due to the forecast of cold weather. All tickets for the ceremony have been deemed commemorative. Ticket holders can no longer attend the ceremony in person.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-11-13H.R. 5371 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-19H. Res. 719 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 11Next →