
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 202 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Domestic violence doesn't discriminate between Red and Blue zip codes, so our response as lawmakers needs to remain bipartisan, as it has been since the passage of VAWA in 1994.
Supporting survivors will never be 'waste, fraud and abuse,' no matter how much Donald Trump thinks it is.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Under the GOP Tax Scam, no one is too rich for a tax handout.
@repgwenmoore.bsky.social:
Republicans scrapped their own rules requiring 72 hours to read a bill so they could eke out a win in the middle of the night.
The American people are going to pay the price for Republican’s tax giveaways to billionaires with their health.
Donald Trump and the GOP are not ‘reforming’ the system, they’re strip mining it to serve the rich.
apnews.com/live/donald-...
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
We know that the GOP's big, ugly bill wants to cut $1 trillion dollars from essential services.
@repgwenmoore.bsky.social lays it all out: buff.ly/Xa7WnVu
I’m overjoyed and can certainly say the decision ICE made today to accept Yessenia’s appeal is the right one.
She is an upstanding member of the community fleeing trafficking who has the right to have her case heard.
She holds a valid work authorization. She is not a risk to public safety. Deporting her will not make our country safer.
My office is doing everything we can to prevent Ms. Yessenia Ruano Andres, a survivor of human trafficking, from being deported tomorrow.
She has been a pillar of our community for 14 years. She is a bilingual kindergarten teachers aid and a mother to two U.S. citizens.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Let us reintroduce ourselves: We are the Democratic Women’s Caucus.
96 women strong.
And we are fighting for you in Congress, in the courts, and in our communities.
@pocan.house.gov & I were granted access to the Dodge Co. facility contracted with ICE. While it was a well-run facility, I was concerned that I couldn’t talk to any detainees.
I will continue honoring my oversight responsibilities & fighting to protect the rights of everyone on American soil.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Just wrapped up a tour with @repgwenmoore.bsky.social of Wisconsin’s only ICE detention facility.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Joining my friend, @repgwenmoore.bsky.social, to visit the only ICE Detention Center in Wisconsin. We're exercising our constitutional congressional oversight duties.
I’m here with @pocan.house.gov
at a facility in Dodge County where ICE detainees are being held.
We’re here in our oversight capacity as members of Congress to ensure their rights are being respected.
We’ll keep y’all in the loop.
Donald Trump is deporting people with valid asylum claims, fully aware they could face violence or death like my constituent Yessenia Ruano.
He does not see a difference between criminals and our hardworking neighbors.
Credit where it is due - at least “Our bill will kill you” is a lot more honest than “it doesn’t cut SNAP or Medicaid.”
I generally legislate to improve lives, not end them. But that is why we have two parties.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
We checked, it’s true.
The Republican tax bill gives millionaires and billionaires a massive tax handout. A handout that is 310 times larger than what people making under $50,000 get.
@repgwenmoore.bsky.social:
People keep asking me what comes next after the House GOP passed the Big Bonanza for Billionaires and the reckless and cruel cuts it makes to healthcare.
Y'all, the fight isn't over. The fight is now in the Senate, so keep paying close attention.
The condition this article is describing is colloquially known as stagflation. The Fed is bracing for a period of GOP stagflation.
Economic policy by strong breeze 🐔🌮
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.