Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 35 sponsored · 228 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Republicans wanted you to be sleeping while we talked about what a bad deal their bill is for the people.
Here's what you missed ⬇️
I am monitoring the ongoing situation at the Zeidler Municipal Building, praying for the safety of all involved, and thank law enforcement for their swift response.
This GOP tax bill rigs the system against average Americans.
We simply should not, as a society, starve children and deny the infirm healthcare all so society can lavish the elites with more and more.
The GOP tax bill is a perverse breach of the social contract.
www.axios.com/2025/05/15/t...
I know what it’s like to go cold and hungry as a child.
If Republicans were truly concerned about getting women to have babies, they wouldn’t cut SNAP or leave America’s poorest children behind in their CTC proposal.
Our children are worth every dime.
We just wrapped 18 hrs of debate on the GOP Tax Bill. Their plan is clear:
1) add tripwires around Americans accessing their health care
2) count on people to FAIL to keep up w/ paperwork
3) funnel the 'savings' (aka lost health care) to the ultra wealthy through tax giveaways
I won't mince words. In mark up, my Republican colleague has feigned concern over “life” to justify leaving behind the poorest children in their Child Tax Credit.
If they were truly 'pro-life,' they would make the credit fully refundable, so we can lift families from the bottom up.
6 hours in to this mark up, and I'll say one thing about my colleagues on the other side of the aisle: they never give up when it comes to twisting themselves up like pretzels to explain how cutting health care for millions of people is somehow a good economic policy.
If Republicans were serious about helping families, they wouldn't make provisions for children, workers, and the elderly in their 'big, beautiful bill' TEMPORARY (just until the next presidential election...)
Meanwhile they make PERMANENT the tax giveaways for the uber wealthy.
To my Republican colleagues: one day Donald Trump will be gone, but when your descendants go to search you up, your legacy will be taking away the health care and SNAP millions need, all to enrich the richest among us.
Tax relief for *actual* small businesses should be a bipartisan priority.
But under Trump’s Tax Scam 1.0, pass-through entities making $100M+ got an average of $10M in “small business” deductions , while *actual* small businesses averaged just $6,500.
The GOP shouldn't have a 2.0.
Republicans have put your health care and food assistance on the menu to pay for tax cuts for billionaires and large corporations.
🤬🚨STARTING SOON
@waysmeanscmte.bsky.social
will be reviewing the Trump Tax Scam 2.0, which aims to give trillions in tax handouts to the richest Americans, and pay for it by ripping health care from millions of Americans.
The NONPARTISAN Congressional Budget Office CONCURS with me that millions of people will be kicked off their health care coverage if Republicans pass Trump’s “one big beautiful bill.”
Couldn’t say it any better.
🚨 “House Republican Proposal Would Shrink Medicaid Coverage to Advance Trump’s Agenda”
➡️ “… would cause millions of poor Americans to lose health coverage and millions more to pay higher fees when they go to the doctor.”
www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/u...
So, tune in, speak up, and don’t let Republicans off the hook on this. I know I don’t plan on letting them.
For all the chaos, much of it is smoke screens. The real goal is making the rich richer while we’re all too busy fighting over Trump’s latest outrageous comment to see that their scheme will leave ordinary Americans behind.
It likely won’t garner a bunch of viral moments. Most members, myself included, aren’t household names. But I implore you to pay as much attention to this as you would the impeachment hearings or the Jan 6 committee.
It likely won’t garner a bunch of viral moments. Most members, myself included, aren’t household names.
But I implore you to pay as much attention to this as you would the impeachment hearings or the Jan 6 committee.
See you tomorrow!
So, tune in, speak up, and don’t let Republicans off the hook on this. I know I don’t plan on letting them. I'll be posting tomorrow, and a link to watch will be shared. Follow along!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.