The Trump Administration has consistently lied about ICE's violent acts toward Americans and the abuses that this agency perpetuates every day.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Jersey District 8
Robert Menendez
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes41%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 8
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Robert Menendez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Jersey District 8
SoupScore
Robert's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 20 sponsored · 49 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
What the hat says
This is not who we are as a country, and we cannot be silent in this moment.
I recently led my New Jersey colleagues in urging the EPA to follow the science: greenhouse gases endanger families in NJ. We will keep fighting for clean air and a healthier future for our children.
This would set back progress for communities already overburdened by pollution and the impacts of climate change.
Our communities from Elizabeth to Newark to Hoboken have born the brunt of climate change for far too long and the Trump Admins' latest effort to revoke the EPA’s Endangerment Finding is unacceptable.
Thank you to the Jersey City Council for passing a resolution calling to abolish ICE.
ICE is a lawless and out-of-control agency that is inflicting terror on communities across the country, including in Jersey City. It must be ended and I am committed to stopping these abuses and abolishing ICE.
The work is far from done and our fight continues to protect our communities and make life more affordable for all Americans.
Last night, pressure on our Republican colleagues worked in our fight to make life more affordable for families.
We successfully passed legislation in the House that would terminate Trump’s tariffs on Canada which have worsened the affordability crisis.
Instead of answers, employees have to sign confidentiality agreements for information on how their employer is empowering ICE. We've been sounding the alarm and will continue to do so.
If you work at Palantir and want to know about how your company supports federal immigration enforcement, you have to sign an NDA.
That’s telling.
Your private information is now not only less secure, but it's being weaponized against our neighbors by the IRS.
House Democrats will fight this until our confidential tax records are secure and ICE no longer exists. (PS the Trump Administration is admitting that immigrants DO pay taxes)
A federal grand jury shut down the Trump Admin's latest attempt to silence dissent & intimidate public servants yesterday.
The Constitution won & will continue to win the more we speak out, defend our values, & fight to build a better future for our children in the country we all love so deeply.
In response, we've taken an all-hands approach to find solutions at all levels of government and introduced legislation to ban non-essential helicopter traffic in the region. Protecting our neighborhoods and putting safety first is our top priority.
We will not relent in this fight. 🚁🔨
Community is how we keep our communities safe.
Grateful to the Hudson County Chamber of Commerce for holding this virtual ICE enforcement training for businesses on Wednesday, Feb. 11 from 12-1 PM.
Now more than ever, it's important to stay educated and know your rights.
This is why we are fighting to end ICE, impeach Kristi Noem and end this national nightmare.
A father - married to a U.S. citizen - picking up diapers for his kids in Kearny.
That is who the Trump Administration thinks is a threat to our communities. The Soto family doesn’t deserve this cruel and heartless treatment - no one does.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 1681 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Res. 1156 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 1689 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Res. 965 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6398 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6398 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6409 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6409 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Con. Res. 40 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 965 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 1174 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 1174 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-14 | H.R. 7613 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-14 | H.R. 1011 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | — | Motion to Adjourn | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-27 | H.R. 7084 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-26 | H. Res. 1128 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-24 | H.R. 6422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-19 | H.R. 4638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 1958 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 3971 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H.R. 4294 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.