Over 25 years ago, the FDA approved mifepristone as a safe and effective drug for abortion and miscarriage management. Yet, Republicans across the country are trying to use the 19th-century Comstock Act to prevent access by mail.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Virginia District 4
Jennifer L. McClellan
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes43%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jennifer L. McClellan
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratVirginia District 4
SoupScore
Jennifer L.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 153 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Today marks 59 years since Loving v. Virginia, when the SCOTUS struck down Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage.
As a state senator in 2020, I was proud to pass legislation repealing the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which included that ban. Now in Congress, I’m continuing the fight.
#LovingDay
The House was back in session this week with a lot on the agenda.
Here’s what you may have missed.
Happy #Pride!
Today, I introduced a resolution with @repmarktakano.bsky.social, @kaine.senate.gov and @baldwin.senate.gov to issue a formal apology to our LGBTQ+ servicemembers and federal employees who faced discrimination from the government they pledged to serve.
Watch my full remarks here:
Everyone deserves access to options to decide on their own terms when, whether and how to become a parent and treat a range of conditions.
I joined Americans for Contraception, @birthincolor.bsky.social, @ppava.bsky.social and advocates to stress the need to pass the Right to Contraception Act.
The Trump Administration wants to conduct surveillance of the public to target its political enemies. Pulte and Speaker Mike Johnson seem all too eager to help it with this effort.
I refuse to grant someone like Bill Pulte the ability to abuse FISA to infringe on the rights of the American people.
His unwavering loyalty to Trump and pattern of weaponizing his role as Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency against the President’s perceived enemies make granting him unfettered authority under FISA Section 702 unacceptable.
Moreover, President Trump’s selection of Bill Pulte as Acting DNI gives me greater pause to reauthorize Section 702 without reforms.
A partisan attack dog for the President, Pulte has no national security or intelligence experience to qualify him to oversee the United States intelligence apparatus.
While Section 702 has been an important tool to collect, analyze and share foreign intelligence information on terrorists and other foreign targets, it also has been weaponized to spy on American citizens through loopholes that allow the government to purchase their data for warrantless searches.
I cannot vote for a FISA Section 702 reauthorization bill that does not include reforms to improve accountability and balance privacy concerns with our national security priorities.
Here’s why this and Trump’s pick for Acting Director of National Intelligence matter 🧵
ICYMI: In a rare moment of bipartisanship, the House passed the Faster Labor Contracts Act to accelerate contract negotiations between newly-unionized workers and management.
I voted yes because once workers unionize, they shouldn’t have to wait years for a collective bargaining agreement.
Despite these efforts, gender pay disparities persist, with women earning 20% less than what men earn on average for equal work. The gap is even worse for women of color.
In Congress, I’m co-sponsoring the Paycheck Fairness Act to eliminate gender-based wage discrimination and ensure equal pay.
63 years ago today, President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act into law, forbidding employers from paying men and women different wages or acquiring different benefits for the same amount of work or skills.
Watch my full remarks here:
A nuclear energy strategy that supports true American energy independence requires a safe and well-regulated nuclear energy sector. During today’s Energy Subcommittee hearing, I focused on how the Trump Administration’s actions threaten the independence of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bill Pulte is wholly unqualified to be the Director of National Intelligence. But he is unwaveringly loyal to President Trump and will do anything he says without question, even if it violates the U.S. Constitution.
THAT’S who Republicans want us to give U.S. surveillance authority to???
Reposted byRep. Jennifer McClellan
Republicans have once again rubber-stamped Trump's extreme, corrupt agenda—this time giving billions of dollars to out-of-control agencies and green-lighting his self-serving slush fund and gold-plated ballroom.
Statement from New Dem Leadership.
I urge the Administration to invest in critical public safety and community programs that actually work, not their overly aggressive mass detention and deportation campaign and political theater that come at the expense of access to health care, education and improved economic opportunity.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History581 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
581 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.