This assault is not only on @padilla.senate.gov, but on freedom of speech and expression in our country.
These actions taken by Trump’s DHS communicates a message to all Americans that none of us is safe.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 11
Nancy Pelosi
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 615
Yes39%
No51%
Present1%
Not Voting10%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 11
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Nancy Pelosi
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 11
SoupScore
Nancy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 0 sponsored · 20 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Trump Administration's actions in Los Angeles are a dangerous abuse of power which inflames tensions and undermines public safety.
House Democrats from California are united in standing against the President's blatant and unconstitutional overreach in our state.
The Trump Administration’s escalation and provocation inflames tensions and incites violence.
The American people must be able to exercise their Constitutional right to lawfully and peacefully protest.
We must shine a bright light on this Administration’s tactics so freedom of speech prevails.
Now we see the President of the United States say he’d arrest a sitting American governor for disagreeing with these actions.
This is a hallmark of authoritarianism on the road to tyranny – and all Americans should be shocked and appalled by the President’s blatant disregard for our Constitution.
The ongoing arrests in California of families and children obeying the law are evidence of a broader pattern of ICE’s renegade behavior across the country.
The resulting peaceful demonstrations against these actions are a manifestation of understandable fear in our communities.
81 years ago, Allied forces stormed the beaches of Normandy with unmatched courage to liberate Europe from tyranny and fascism.
Today, we honor their heroism on D-Day, reflect on the cost of freedom and rededicate ourselves to defending democracy in our time.
36 years after the Tiananmen Square Massacre, I was honored to meet with my friend, survivor Jianli Yang, whose meaningful gift warmed my heart.
A lifelong champion for democracy, he joined me to reflect on the fight for freedom in China and rising authoritarianism worldwide.
We must never forget what happens when a government uses force to suppress protestors. We must keep faith with the people of China who long for dignity, democracy and human rights.
The world must never stop honoring their sacrifice or standing up to tyranny in all its forms.
Since 1989, the Chinese Communist Party has only deepened its repression: jailing dissidents, committing genocide against Uyghurs, erasing Tibet’s identity, dismantling freedoms in Hong Kong, threatening Taiwan—and silencing anyone who dares speak the truth.
Our act of remembrance honored the brave souls who lost their lives. Their courage echoes through time as a symbol of what it means to rise up against tyranny.
While Beijing rewarded their soldiers for their brutality and tried to bury the story—the world remembers.
In 1991, I proudly joined my colleagues in Tiananmen Square to unfurl a banner that read: “To those who died for democracy in China.”
Within moments, CCP police moved in, harassing reporters and forcing us to leave. But they could not erase the memory or the truth of Tiananmen.
36 years ago, the world watched as thousands of ordinary Chinese citizens—unarmed and unafraid—gathered in Tiananmen Square to demand democracy.
While the regime responded with tanks and bullets, it could not crush their courage or silence their call for freedom.
Our military is the most powerful in the world – but this spiteful move does not strengthen our national security or the 'warrior' ethos.
It is a shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American Dream.
The despicable targeting of Jewish people must be clearly and firmly condemned and stopped.
We must stand against hate in all its forms—and in solidarity with those praying for the full recovery of the victims of yesterday's heinous attack of antisemitic terror in Boulder.
Every June, we celebrate the beauty, bravery and brilliance of our LGBTQ+ community.
#PrideMonth is a powerful reminder that love triumphs over hate—and that our march for justice, dignity and equality continues on.
104 years ago, a white supremacist mob burned homes, murdered families and destroyed Black prosperity in Tulsa’s Greenwood District.
The Tulsa Race Massacre remains a stain on our nation. We must honor the victims by continuing the fight for equality and justice in our time.
Yesterday, I joined leaders in San Francisco's Japantown to condemn the devastating impacts of Trump's budget cuts on the AAPI community.
Republicans' cruel and evil Robin Hood in reverse is hurting the most vulnerable Americans — all to give tax cuts to billionaires.
Today, we mourn the Lion of Lenox Avenue: Chairman Charles Rangel. A decorated war hero, civil rights leader and trailblazing legislator, he spent decades fighting for justice, equality and economic opportunity.
My prayers are with the Rangel family and the Harlem community.
On Memorial Day, we honor the many selfless heroes who made the ultimate sacrifice to defend our nation and safeguard our democracy. Their courage echoes through generations—and compels us to uphold the values they died to protect.
We will never forget.
Three years ago, 21 lives—19 precious children and 2 devoted educators—were stolen in a horrific act of violence at Robb Elementary.
Today, our hearts remain with Uvalde. In their memory, we must turn pain into purpose and end America’s gun violence epidemic once and for all.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History615 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
615 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.