Glyphosate is turning up in more and more places, including our forests and food supply. That should concern everyone.
After a troubling story on Forest Service spraying, @rephuffman.bsky.social and I are demanding answers.
I pressed Sec. Rollins directly: Are we looking at the whole picture here?
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1
Chellie Pingree
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes41%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 176 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Get a load of this.
Secretary Rollins just said “glyphosate is safe” … really? The cancer-causing chemical that Bayer has literally spent BILLIONS on fighting and settling lawsuits is “safe”?
Thank you @repmcgovern.bsky.social for holding her feet to the fire on this.
Apparently my blueberry pie wasn't good enough to save ferry funding.
Republicans zeroed out $40M in grants communities rely on to get to work, school, the doctor, and the mainland. That's a *sliver* of the federal budget.
My amendment would've restored funding. I’ll keep fighting to get it back.
HUGE NEWS: The House just FINALLY passed the War Powers Resolution.
Congress has, and always will have, the sole power to declare war. No lawless president can change that. Now, the Senate needs to follow suit.
NO WAR IN IRAN.
Republicans keep saying there isn’t enough money for clean water, museums, climate science, public lands, or basic services.
But somehow there's always more money for Trump’s pet projects.
This is a choice:
Trump’s ego over the public interest.
Trump’s vanity over the needs of working families.
The Kennedy Center is a national treasure and a living monument to JFK and his love of the arts. We need to do everything we can to preserve and protect it.
Trump’s incompetence nearly destroyed the Kennedy Center. Now he wants to “transfer it back to Congress”!?!?
First: What the hell does THAT mean?
Second: We need answers on how the Center will be run moving forward (and Congress’s oversight role).
My amendment simply called for more transparency.
They don’t call it “breaking bread” for nothing!
Today’s markup lunch: Idaho fries from Rep. Simpson + my homemade wild Maine blueberry pies (leave it to a Mainer to whip up 8 pies in a morning!).
Maybe after this we can come back to the table and make this funding bill bipartisan!
One can hope.
The Kennedy Center is a national treasure and a living monument to JFK and his love of the arts. We need to do everything we can to preserve and protect it.
The whole debate is pretty illuminating.
Republicans argued the amendment was pointless. But Trump has REPEATEDLY ignored Congress and moved money around however he wants—the ballroom, the East Wing, the reflecting pool.
This is about taking a stand and reclaiming our power as a *co-equal* branch!
One of my amendments was simple: NO TRUMP ARCH!
Most Americans oppose it. Veterans groups oppose it. It’s a huge waste of taxpayer money.
Republicans say there’s no funding in the bill for an arch anyway. You think Trump cares about Congressional approval!?
They can't stand up to him on ANYTHING!
The Republicans’ spending bill for Interior + Environment is a disaster:
🚨 20% cut to EPA
🚨 Free passes to polluters
🚨 Rollbacks on PFAS regulations
🚨 Millions for Trump’s vanity projects
They care more about the president’s ego than the health of people and our planet.
We're in for a FIGHT.
Our fishing communities, working waterfronts, and coastal towns need the best science available to understand rapidly changing ocean conditions and prepare for what is coming.
Ignoring the climate crisis won't make it go away. It just makes us less prepared for what comes next.
Trump’s decision to dismantle the Ocean Observatories Initiative is incredibly shortsighted.
This network provides real-time data on ocean warming, marine heat waves, coastal flooding, fishery health, and powerful currents that shape our climate.
Maine will feel the impacts of losing this data.
This reporting confirms what many have suspected all along: that these cancellations had nothing to do with rooting out “waste, fraud, and abuse,” and everything to do with targeting programs that actually help people of color.
Back in March, USDA terminated $300 million in grants that helped underserved farmers.
They say the money was being used for frivolous expenses. But many recipients are scratching their heads. Not only do they know nothing about these alleged purchases; the expenses have ZERO to do with the grant!
Chilly ferry ride! Heading to DC for a busy week:
🔴War Powers Resolution to rein in Trump’s illegal war (Republicans can’t run away this time!)
🔴 Interior + Environment markup, where we’ll fight Trump’s looting of NPS for his vanity projects
🔴 More lies and craziness, no doubt
Let’s get to work.
Happy #Pride! 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🇺🇸
Not only will these rollbacks harm people and communities; they'll put enormous financial pressure on states.
We’ll keep fighting this anti-science Administration tooth and nail. And we won’t stop until the EPA returns to its mission of protecting people and the planet—not the profits of polluters.
BIG fight ahead on EPA funding and the agency’s ridiculous rollbacks on toxic chemicals.
PFAS in drinking water.
Delayed compliance on vehicle emissions and pollution from coal-fired plants.
Postponing regulations on efficient refrigerators.
Republicans want to give the green light to ALL of it.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | PRESENT | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.