While you’re getting ready for the Super Bowl, remember that Trump’s tariff taxes made your day WAY more expensive.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 2
Mark Pocan
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes39%
No59%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 2
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark Pocan
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 2
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 140 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byRep. Mark Pocan
Throwback to the time Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent couldn’t answer a question that’s covered in Economics 101: Who pays tariffs?
Here’s what was likely going on inside his head.
Great news! Time ranked @uwmadison.bsky.social among the top 20 universities in the world. IN THE WORLD!
I’m honored to have secured hundreds of millions of dollars for our incredible institution and look forward to seeing it thrive for years to come.
A new report shows that Trump’s tariff taxes have cost the average Wisconsinite in my district $1,960.
See how much more you’re paying at: democrats-budget.house.gov/legislation/....
I am excited to announce that I’ve introduced legislation with @ross.house.gov, @cleaver.house.gov, and @repemiliasykes.bsky.social to end prison gerrymandering!
No one considers a prison their home.
Yet prison gerrymandering counts incarcerated people as residents in places they don’t call home, giving power to regions of the country and elected officials who do not value their concerns.
Throwback to the time Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent couldn’t answer a question that’s covered in Economics 101: Who pays tariffs?
Here’s what was likely going on inside his head.
This week, I voted once again to NOT fund ICE. They are a rogue agency that must be held accountable.
Trump and Musk decimated USAID. Estimates show this has already led to 1 MILLION preventable deaths. The short documentary, Rovina’s Choice, tells one of those stories.
Trump can bring USAID back at any time. Choosing not to is cruelty for cruelty’s sake.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oj0P...
So much for the "Golden Age of America"
Trump’s attempt to 'take over' and 'nationalize' voting is blatantly unconstitutional, and we won’t let it happen.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/tru...
There is a lot going on, and sometimes it’s hard to keep track. For today’s podcast, I had a great discussion with @rachelbitecofer.bsky.social on how to make sense of it all, including ICE, tariffs, Greenland, and more!
Check it out here:
youtu.be/l6c6M2mhf74
Yesterday, @laborcaucus.house.gov had a great discussion with @afacwa.org President, @flyingwithsara.bsky.social, on the importance of flight attendants’ rights to organize.
A short recap of what happened in the last year:
1. Republicans ended the Affordable Care Act tax credits
2. Premiums rose for nearly every American
3. Fewer Wisconsinites signed up for health insurance in 2026
ICE is terrorizing our communities.
Democrats are fighting to impeach Kristi Noem, provide no more funding for ICE, and hold them all accountable.
If you’re looking for some good news, Democrats keep winning special elections. Just this past weekend, voters flipped a Texas state Senate seat with a 31-point swing. The American people are ready for change!
Over the weekend, five-year-old Liam and his father, Adrian, were released from ICE custody. This is a great example of why it's so important to keep up the public pressure!
Don Lemon was released after a judge ruled that Lemon had "no evidence" of any criminal behavior. Trump’s authoritarian attempts to intimidate and silence journalists won’t work!
Imagine if Trump devoted even half this energy to lowering costs for the American people.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 5764 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-01-20 | H.R. 5763 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.