Mark Pocan headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Wisconsin District 2
Born
August 14, 1964
Age 61
Phone
(202) 225-2906
Office
1026 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 2

Mark Pocan

Mark William Pocan is an American politician and businessman serving as the U.S. representative from Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district since 2013. The district is based in the state capital, Madison. A member of the Democratic Party, Pocan is co-chair of the Congressional LGBT Equality Caucus and chair emeritus of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. From 1999 to 2013 he served as a member of the Wisconsin State Assembly, representing the 78th district, succeeding Tammy Baldwin there, whom he also replaced in the House when Baldwin was elected to the U.S. Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 550
Yes40%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 2

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Pocan headshot
Mark Pocan
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 2
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 144 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The House GOP majority is voting on a tax cut for their billionaire donors at the expense of Medicaid, covering nearly a quarter of Americans. I will NEVER support cutting Medicaid or giving handouts to billionaires, but especially not both!
Happy Public Schools Week! As a proud public school graduate from kindergarten through college, I know firsthand the value of a strong public education system. That’s why I introduced a resolution in Congress to recognize and celebrate Public Schools Week.
A lot of people have been reaching out to us about the chaos and confusion we’re seeing in the Trump administration. It’s intentional. By emphasizing how EVERYONE will be affected, we can provide the clarity people need. Check out this week’s #MagicMonday! youtube.com/shorts/9DeOs...
Wealthy elites know that tax cuts for the super-rich are extremely unpopular. It’s why they try to distract us with scapegoats like immigrants, trans people, and a catch-all like DEI. Don’t fall for it.
Trump and Musk slashing entire government agencies is NOT about waste, fraud, and abuse. It’s about finding cash for a $4.5 trillion tax break for a small group of out-of-touch billionaires, including themselves. It’s not right vs. left. It’s wealthy elites vs. normal people.
It's genuinely unfortunate that Republicans didn't show up to hear the concerns of Wisconsin farmers who are very worried about what Trump & Elon cutting their federal funding & contracts could mean for their livelihoods and the future of their family farms.
I met with scientists at University of Wisconsin-Madison, visited a local Head Start program, and hosted a press conference on the Republican Rip Off, the massive tax cut for the wealthiest Americans Congressional Republican are trying to pass.
The farmers I spoke to are worried about Trump & Elon cutting their federal funding & contracts. To all our Wisconsin farmers, I hear you and I have your back!
Great bold plans from @govevers.wisconsin.gov! He wants Wisconsin to be the first state in America to audit insurance companies for denying healthcare claims. The American people are tired of getting ripped off by their health insurance companies, and it’s great to have a governor who listens.
Elon Musk is using DOGE as an excuse to sledgehammer entire agencies that help the poorest and everyday people. Why? To free up cash for a $4.5 trillion tax cut for a small group of his billionaire buddies.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
550 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 888 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-11-18H.R. 4405 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H.R. 2659 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-17H.R. 1608 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-13H.R. 5371 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-19H. Res. 719 (119th)Approve resolutionPRESENTYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 11Next →