I am horrified and heartbroken by the political violence that took the lives of Minnesota Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband, and left State Senator John Hoffman and his wife fighting for their lives.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Illinois District 3
Delia C. Ramirez
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes36%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Delia C. Ramirez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratIllinois District 3
SoupScore
Delia C.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 203 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Authoritarian power thrives when we stay silent, so we have to be loud. If you are joining the protests today thank you for showing up with your voice, your story, and your power. We have to legislate, litigate, and agitate–and it all starts with organizing. No Kings!
www.mobilize.us/indivisiblec...
Hey Republicans, instead of wasting time on your witch hunt of Democratic Governors you could try holding Noem and the Trump administration accountable for assaulting a US Senator.
The Trump administration is now normalizing assaulting members of Congress. Noem refuses to allow congressional oversight because she has no regard for the Constitution. I'll say it again, she needs to resign.
It's always a pleasure to join Bloomingdale Township Democrats for their annual Rose Fitzpatrick Legislation Breakfast, celebrating community leaders and Democratic candidates working to build power together. Shout out to Terrell Barnes, BTDO Chair, on another great event!
People have rightfully refused to stay silent as they have witnessed their neighbors being kidnapped. Communitiy members have a right to exercise their constitutionally protected right to protest their government. But Donald Trump stopped caring about the constitution a long time ago.
The Trump administration's ongoing actions in LA are authoritarian measures intended to villify dissent. This isn't about safety, it's about control.
Reposted byDelia Catalina Ramirez
In 2020, the National Guard was used against BLM protests, today the National Guard is being used against immigrant rights defenders in L.A. Who will it be tomorrow? #LosAngeles #immigrants #BLM #NationalGuard
This is governance by oligarchs working exactly as designed. A couple of billionaires having a pissing contest to distract us from the way they wrecked our economy, kidnapped our neighbors, and rigged our budget to steal from working people.
Today in Chicago, people attempting to do things the right and legal way, by showing up to immigration check-ins, were lured to ISAP and entrapped by ICE so that the fascists in the White House can meet their daily deportation quotas.
I am honored to be in the struggle for peace, justice, and our collective liberation with all of you.
There is no better way to celebrate another year of life than with the community that supports me and keeps me rooted, especially during such difficult times. Thank you to all who joined us and continue to support our people-powered movement.
To our LGBTQ+ community: I hear you, I see you, and I will always fight alongside you.
As we celebrate Pride, let's also honor the movement of protest and resistance that gave rise to it. What began with Black and Brown Trans women at Stonewall continues today, as we face a hateful administration trying to reverse the progress we've made.
To our LGBTQ+ community: I hear you, I see you, and I will always fight alongside you.
This is wrong, incredibly dangerous, and unacceptable behavior. Even when we disagree, we all have a responsibility to engage in civil discourse with each other with humility, care, and most importantly, the truth.
I take this responsibility seriously. It's disappointing that so many do not.
Even though these claims have been debunked, many of these posts remain up and continue to be shared widely. These individuals have intentionally politicized a tragedy without bothering to fact check the incendiary claims they were propagating.
Today, in the aftermath of the horrific attack in DC last night, many who are seeking to discredit the progressive movement in Chicago have purposely shared misinformation attempting to connect the shooter to local progressive movement spaces and elected leaders.
As a person of faith, committed to seeing a more just and peaceful world, I am mourning today over the horrific attack that caused the death of Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim. I condemn this act of violence and all forms of hatred, bigotry, and antisemitism in the strongest terms.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.