Jeanne Shaheen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Hampshire
Born
January 28, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-2841
Office
506 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire

Jeanne Shaheen

Voting Record — 885
Yes42%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jeanne Shaheen headshot
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 96 sponsored · 325 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Today marks the 61st anniversary of Medicare and Medicaid, landmark programs that expanded health care access to millions. Unfortunately, Republicans are intent on reversing this progress—slashing health care funding to ensure less, not more, can access the care they need.
Our Russia and Iran sanctions legislation is narrowly crafted to address the top five users of Russian oil and gas and to protect our allies who are making important efforts to get off Russian gas. We must cut off the revenues that are funding Russia's war machine.
As health care prices soar, too many Americans cannot afford the medicine they need to live. To protect the over 8 million Americans who depend on insulin to survive, we must pass my INSULIN Act and cap this life-saving medicine at $35 per month.
The DoD's lack of transparency on the war in Iran is a disservice to the American people and most importantly to the families of our service members. The Pentagon must immediately provide a complete accounting of those who have been killed, injured or wounded in this operation.
As energy prices soar due to the war in Iran, we should do all we can to insulate the American people from these costs. Yet the Administration is doing just the opposite—rolling back energy-efficiency and exposing Americans to even higher energy bills. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/21/c...
With too many feeling squeezed by rising health care prices, capping insulin prices at $35 a month is a step we can take right now to deliver real financial relief. My INSULIN act would do just that. I was proud to see it advance out of the HELP Committee last week. Now let’s make it law!
Before the President's war in Iran, Americans were already struggling to afford everyday essentials like groceries. It’s only gotten worse since. The President said he was going to lower costs. Instead, he’s making life harder for American families at every turn.
I was proud to help represent New Hampshire's aerospace sector on the global stage at the Farnborough Air Show last weekend. As our top export sector, it was great to connect Granite State businesses with industry leaders to fuel innovation and economic growth in our state!
As health care prices soar, millions of Americans are forced to choose between affording life-saving insulin or paying for rent or groceries. No one should have to make that choice. By capping insulin at $35 per month, my INSULIN Act ensures that’s the case.
The Iran War never should have started, and the President hasn't achieved any of the goals he set out. We have a more hardline regime, we haven't dealt with their nuclear program and now the Strait is a pawn in this war—raising costs on American families. This war needs to end.
I thank Senators Collins, Warnock and Kennedy for their leadership on our INSULIN Act to cap insulin at $35 a month for Americans across the country. We are proud that critical legislation advanced out of the Senate HELP Committee today. Our full statement:
Nearly half of those managing diabetes are forced to shell out thousands a year to afford the insulin they need to live. This cannot stand. We must cap insulin at $35 a month to ensure everyone can afford the life-saving medication they need.
In just the past few weeks we’ve seen two deadly shootings involving ICE, continuing a disturbing, dangerous trend of recklessness by the agency. In response, I joined my Senate colleagues in calling on DHS to implement measures to help prevent future deadly encounters.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
885 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55YESYESMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-40)
2025-05-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-05-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-05-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-05-08S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-49, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-08H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (50-43)
2025-05-08S.J. Res. 7 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (50-38)
2025-05-07S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-05-06H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 18Next →