PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Jeanne Shaheen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Hampshire
Born
January 28, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-2841
Office
506 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire

Jeanne Shaheen

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 885
Yes42%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
BlueskyFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Jeanne Shaheen headshot
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 96 sponsored · 325 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 20(source)
Over 10 years ago, I worked to open the first and only VA facility in the Monadnock region. And after a years-long effort, I'm proud to announce the VA finalized a lease for a new Community Based Outpatient Clinic that will improve access to care for our state’s veterans.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 20(source)
For roughly 8 million Americans, access to insulin is life-or-death. With health care costs rising across the board, we must make sure this life-saving drug remains affordable. By capping insulin at $35 per month, my INSULIN Act would do just that.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 19(source)
There were severe sanctions on Iran at the start of this war, but if President Trump wants to do additional sanctions, let’s do it in a separate bill. But this bill is moving and it will put more pressure on Putin.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 19(source)
Our Russia sanctions legislation narrowly targets the biggest purchasers of Russian oil and gas that are funding their war machine. If we can put more pressure on Putin, we can get him to the table and end this war.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 17(source)
ACA enrollment is plummeting. Billions cut from Medicaid. Tax credits that help pay for premiums expired. At every turn, Republicans are making health care less affordable. American families deserve better. apnews.com/article/affo...
Obamacare rolls shrank dramatically in many states over the past year, new federal data shows
New federal data reveals the first 50-state look at a steep drop in Affordable Care Act enrollment after enhanced subsidies expired in January.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 17(source)
Nobody should be forced to choose between life-saving medication or paying rent. Yet this is reality for Americans managing diabetes. We must end this crisis, and by capping insulin costs at $35 a month, my INSULIN Act would be a major step in doing just that.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 16(source)
The momentum is with Ukraine. Russia's economy is being hit hard, their oil infrastructure is under attack by Ukrainian drones and they are losing over 30,000 casualties a month in Ukraine. The more pressure we can put on Putin now, the better chance we have to end this war.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 16(source)
This new Russia sanctions bill is an effort to narrow the focus and to really get at those countries that are helping to fund this war in Ukraine and fund Russia's war machine. China is number one on the list.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 15(source)
The American people overwhelmingly think that we should not be in a war with Iran, and they don't want to see the increased costs in energy and gasoline prices. It's important for us to get back to the negotiating table with Iran.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 15(source)
The Trump Administration reduced training for ICE agents, hired unqualified people and did nothing to ensure ICE agents in Maine were wearing body cameras. They are responsible for what happened in Maine. It is completely unacceptable and must end now.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 15(source)
Putting troops on the ground in Iran or on Kharg Island or in the region in a way that's going to endanger more lives is not something that the American people will support. The President has had no strategy for this war from the very beginning. It's been a failed effort.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 14(source)
This Russia sanctions bill is a one-two punch that's really going to put pressure on Putin. It comes at a time when there's real momentum on behalf of Ukraine. Russia's losing over 30,000 casualties a month in Ukraine. This is a real opportunity to get Putin to the table.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 14(source)
Yesterday, the President claimed he was going to charge a 20% toll on traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, then backtracked. Despite asking Congress for billions to backfill the Iran war, it appears the Pentagon doesn’t know how it will use foreign funds to enforce a military blockade.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 14(source)
On Monday, ICE agents were involved in yet another deadly shooting, this time in Maine. There must be a full and transparent investigation into what happened, why it happened and what can be done to prevent more deaths.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 13(source)
For decades, UNH and @noaa.gov have produced critical research, and I'm proud to have secured millions in federal funding to support their efforts. It was wonderful to see the site of their new research center, which will ensure our state remains a global leader in ocean mapping.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 13(source)
Since the President started his war in Iran, families in New Hampshire have had to pay nearly $600 more for gas. And now, with President Trump restarting the war, the burden on families across my state will only get worse.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govJul 13(source)
Republicans refused to extend ACA enhanced premium tax credits, and now we’re seeing the result: spiking premiums that are making health care even more unaffordable. Americans want lower costs, yet Republicans are doing just the opposite. pbs.org/newshour/hea...
Obamacare premiums surged this year. A new analysis shows it's likely to happen again in 2027
Middle-income Americans straining to pay for Affordable Care Act health insurance are unlikely to get relief next year, according to a new analysis.
← Newer postsPosts page 3Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
885 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-30H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Defeated (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Defeated (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29S. 2806 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (37-61, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-09-29—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-09-19—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (47-43)
2025-09-19—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-45)
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Defeated (44-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-19S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Defeated (47-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-18—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-09-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-09-17—Decision of the Chair PN12-19 and PN25-28 and PN12-45 and PN22-1 and PN22-2 and PN22-5 and PN22-27 and PN22-20 and PN22-21 and PN26-8 and PN26-34 and PN26-35 and PN55-41 and PN22-4 and PN22-8 and PN22-19 and PN26-1 and PN22-23 and PN25-40 and PN26-7 and PN26-19 and PN26-31 and PN60-3 and PN26-44 and PN25-2 and PN55-16 and PN60-9 and PN60-10 and PN129-8 and PN26-45 and PN141-37 and PN141-7 and PN141-28 and PN12-22 and PN25-21 and PN22-3 and PN26-22 and PN13-5 and PN22-24 and PN25-33 and PN141-18 and PN150-5 and PN345-16 and PN55-42 and PN54-6 and PN54-7 and PN55-45 and PN55-25YESYES✓Decision of Chair Not Sustained (47-52)
2025-09-17—Motion to Reconsider PN55-25 and PN55-45 and PN54-7 and PN54-6 and PN55-42 and PN345-16 and PN150-5 and PN141-18 and PN25-33 and PN22-24 and PN13-5 and PN26-22 and PN22-3 and PN25-21 and PN12-22 and PN141-28 and PN141-7 and PN141-37 and PN26-45 and PN129-8 and PN60-10 and PN60-9 and PN55-16 and PN25-2 and PN26-44 and PN60-3 and PN26-31 and PN26-19 and PN26-7 and PN25-40 and PN22-23 and PN26-1 and PN22-19 and PN22-8 and PN22-4 and PN55-41 and PN26-35 and PN26-34 and PN26-8 and PN22-21 and PN22-20 and PN22-27 and PN22-5 and PN22-2 and PN22-1 and PN12-45 and PN12-19 and PN25-28NONO✓Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (51-47)
2025-09-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-16S. Con. Res. 22 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (36-62)
2025-09-16S.J. Res. 60 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51)
2025-09-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-47)
2025-09-15—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2025-09-15S. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Resolution Agreed to (51-44)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)Decision of the Chair S.Res. 377YESYES✓Decision of Chair Not Sustained (45-53)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)Motion to Reconsider S.Res. 377NONO✓Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (52-45)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-10S. 2296 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-49)
2025-09-09S. Res. 377 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-09S. Res. 377 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-09-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-09-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-09-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-09-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-09-08—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-43)
2025-09-04S. 2296 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (83-13)
2025-09-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-02S. 2296 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (71-23)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYES——Nomination Confirmed (72-22)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (59-35)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (52-42)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (78-17)
2025-08-02—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-19)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-45)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-44)
2025-08-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (53-44)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 18Next →