Tina Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Minnesota
Born
1958
Age 68
Phone
(202) 224-5641
Office
720 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota

Tina Smith

Christine Elizabeth Smith is an American politician, retired Democratic political consultant, and former businesswoman serving as the junior United States senator from Minnesota since 2018. She is a member of the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party (DFL), an affiliate of the Democratic Party.

Voting Record — 772
Yes24%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tina Smith headshot
Tina Smith
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Tina's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 35 sponsored · 278 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The transition to clean energy is going to happen. The only question is if the United States will lead the transition or follow behind China. Projects like this show that clean energy just makes good sense — even in cold states like ours.
Winona Area Public Schools secured $5.5 million in federal tax credits through the Inflation Reduction Act for installing the energy-efficient system. Even better, the geo system will pay for itself with its energy savings.
The system regulates the school temperature by harnessing the earth’s natural heat as energy to keep the building warm in the winter + cool in the summer. It’s a cheaper way to heat/cool the school, doesn’t tie them to the ups and downs of a global oil/gas market and is clean, American-made energy.
Photo of Tina Smith receiving a tour of a geothermal dehumidification system.
Photo of a control panel.
Photo of a pipe with text that reads “CHILLED WATER RETURN SECONDARY”
Pipe with the text “HEATING WATER RETURN”
Two of Winona’s public elementary schools installed something great. It’s nerdy, so bear with me… ✨geothermal dehumidification systems✨
Photo of a Winona, Minnesota elementary school.
The transition to clean energy is going to happen. The only question is if the United States will lead the transition or follow behind China. Projects like this show that clean energy just makes good sense — even in cold states like ours.
Winona Area Public Schools secured $5.5 million in federal tax credits through the Inflation Reduction Act for installing the energy-efficient system. Even better, the geo system will pay for itself with its energy savings.
The system regulates the school temperature by harnessing the earth’s natural heat as energy to keep the building warm in the winter + cool in the summer. It’s a cheaper way to heat/cool the school, doesn’t tie them to the ups and downs of a global oil/gas market and is clean, American-made energy.
Photo of Tina Smith receiving a tour of a geothermal dehumidification system.
Photo of a control panel.
Photo of a pipe with text that reads “CHILLED WATER RETURN SECONDARY”
Pipe with the text “HEATING WATER RETURN”
Two of Winona’s public elementary schools installed something great. It’s nerdy, so bear with me… ✨geothermal dehumidification systems✨
Photo of a Winona, Minnesota elementary school.
Even under the now-halted FDA policy, patients still had to talk to their provider before getting medication for an abortion. This just bans telehealth appointments because anti-choice politicians want to make it as inconvenient and difficult as possible to get mifepristone.
We should all be paying attention to what this means. Getting rid of Roe wasn’t the end game and they will go further. Anti choice extremists in state legislatures are teaming up with allies on the federal bench to take your freedom to control the course of your life.
Minnesota and countless other states have proven how we can safely decriminalize and regulate the cannabis industry. Long overdue for the federal government to take a page out of that playbook.
Reposted byTina Smith
Last week, the U.S. Senate passed a devastating bill that will undo protections for the Boundary Waters. Listen to this feature on NPR's All Things Considered featuring Explorers Amy and Dave Freemans and @smith.senate.gov discussing what this means for the wilderness. www.npr.org/2026/04/18/n...
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
772 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-21End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (44-43)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (46-36)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-34)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-31)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-07-17End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-43)
2025-07-17End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOBill Passed (51-48)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOAmendment Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (47-50)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (46-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (47-52)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-07-15H.R. 4 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-07-15H.R. 4 (119th)Motion to Discharge H.R. 4NONOMotion to Discharge Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-07-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-47)
2025-07-15End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-46)
2025-07-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-07-15End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (69-30)
2025-07-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-28)
2025-07-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (46-42)
2025-07-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-07-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2025-07-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-45)
2025-07-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-07-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2025-07-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-07-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-07-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-07-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (47-42)
2025-07-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (47-41)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 16Next →