Remember when Trump sued ABC, Meta, X, & Paramount, & they all settled for millions?
That money was supposed to go to Trump’s future presidential library fund—but that has been dissolved with no sign of where the money went.
@warren.senate.gov, @blumenthal.senate.gov, & I are demanding answers!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 1
Melanie A. Stansbury
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes40%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Melanie A. Stansbury
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 1
SoupScore
Melanie A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 162 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
TWO BREAKING DEVELOPMENTS IN THE EPSTEIN CASE:
Every day, we honor the brave men and women who serve our communities. This week, we cut the ribbon on Officer Daniel Webster Park in Albuquerque, honoring one of APD’s finest who died in 2015. We were honored to hear from APD Deputy Chief Languit about his former partner and the park’s legacy. ❤️
Time to address the elephant in the room: it is time for Pete Hegseth to go. ⬇️
Any and all public officials who have committed an act of sexual harassment or abuse must be held fully accountable to the public. ⬇️
We are delivering for New Mexico—even as times are tough. Funding for new schools, housing, hospitals, behavioral health and addiction recovery services, public safety, and water projects.
Real investments. Real people. And, real generational change.
In NM, we know the sacrifices our service members have made. That’s why they are at the heart of our work.
From funding a brand-new veteran’s transitional housing center to helping pass the largest expansion of veteran’s benefits with the PACT Act since the GI bill—veterans deserve our support.
You better believe we’ll be investigating.
newrepublic.com/post/207555/...
I know so many of you are scared, angry, and downright pissed off about what’s happening with Trump’s war in the Middle East.
So, I want to give a little breakdown on what’s happening, Congress’s authority, and what comes next.
Once again: New Mexico is leading the way!
Yesterday, the NM DOJ began its investigation at Zorro Ranch. Why did the FBI tell NM to drop its case in 2019? Who asked them to do so and why?
That’s why this new investigation is so important. Survivors have waited too long for justice, and NM is leading the way.
Breaking Epstein Investigation Update! NM DOJ has begun searching Zorro Ranch. ⬇️
BREAKING: @nmdoj.bsky.social begun its on-the-ground investigation of Zorro Ranch TODAY. Epstein survivors have waited too long for justice.
NM DOJ is seeking credible tips about the crimes committed by Epstein and his associates in NM. You can report them here:
nmdoj.gov/get-help/eps...
To all the administration officials violating the rule of law: we will hold you accountable. Whether you survive your current positions or not.
Calling all high school students in NM-01! My office is now taking submissions for the Congressional Art Competition!
Submit YOUR art for the opportunity to show your work in our nation's capital for a whole year.
The deadline is April 24th. Find more info here: stansbury.house.gov/services/art...
As millions of Americans wondered how they were going to pay rent, afford food, and whether their sons and daughters would be sent off to war…this is how the President spent his weekend…unbothered, hanging out at his private resort.
To my colleagues across the aisle still covering for him, wake up.
While this Admin spends nearly $1 billion a day on a war in the Middle East that has claimed the lives of 7 U.S. service members and doing the bidding of billionaires—Americans are struggling to put food on the table and a roof over their heads.
But, House Dems are working for the American people!
Today—on International Women’s Day—we stand with survivors: those able to speak out and those still quietly carrying their stories alone.
Know you are not alone. Together, millions are standing with you to end the silence, end the shame, and end the abuse. Together we are changing history. ❤️
Grateful to join KRQE’s podcast New Mexico News Insiders, where we talked about Congress, our work in New Mexico, and the Epstein Case.
Give it a listen here:
Officials have detected PFAS levels above federal guidelines in at least 15 water systems across NM—including Albuquerque’s VA Hospital.
While the feds under this Administration are dismantling water quality standards, NM is acting to protect our waters. Because, water is life.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.