
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 1
Melanie A. Stansbury
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes41%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Melanie A. Stansbury
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 1
SoupScore
Melanie A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 167 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Tonight, our hearts are with the family and loved ones of those lost in the crash from Wichita to D.C.
Thank you to all of the first responders on the scene. ❤️🙏
This is an absolute betrayal of our Service Members and everyone who proudly serves.
The White House is trying to claim the federal funding freeze that sent millions of Americans into chaos yesterday is a “hoax.”
Firefighters, police, state, local and tribal governments…
Dude, we have the receipts. And, it’s your own memo. We will not be gaslit.
Donald Trump calls his Admin the “New Golden Age," but let's call it what it is: “The Great Betrayal.”
He promised he would address the cost of living and issues affecting Americans. But in just seven days, he's disrupted every aspect of American life.
He is chaos.
Video continued:
Video continued:
Video continued:
I am so happy to be home! I’ll be spending time in our communities, talking to all of you, giving remarks to the State Legislature, and of course, eating all the chile!
Here’s some updates since I’ve been back in NM-01:
DOGE Dems are ready to work on behalf of the American people. But we have to face the reality that over the last 6 days Trump has attacked federal employees, fired inspector generals, and made efforts to eviscerate the federal workforce.
That’s why we’re ready to fight back.
In a late night purge, Trump fired over a dozen Inspector Generals, illegally removing non-partisan watchdogs who ensure our agencies remain accountable to the American people. This is not about government efficiency.
We will hold him accountable.
After Trump unilaterally renamed Mt. Denali without any Tribal Consultation—I introduced an amendment in HNRC alongside @fernandez.house.gov & @rephuffman.bsky.social to require Tribal Consultation in the Committee’s rules.
Unfortunately, our GOP colleagues VOTED NO.
As Trump removed the U.S. from international climate agreements this week and unleashed a slew of anti-climate and clean energy executive orders—we’re ready to fight back and protect our air, lands, and waters!
Education is a human right. Every single person deserves access to education and the tools they need to thrive.
Now more than ever, it is critical we ensure everyone has access to education and information. Our democracy depends on it. #InternationalDayofEducation
12 years ago, the U.S. lifted the ban on women in combat roles in the military. Trump's DOD nominee, Pete Hegseth, wants to reverse that decision.
Women deserve leaders that will fight for them, not hold them back.
New Mexico: know your rights! If you need more assistance, call my office at (505) 346-6781.
Stay safe and take care of each other!
What to know about DOGE: Trump & the GOP plan to go after the Federal Workforce and already have.
What we also know about DOGE: We *will* fight back to protect the programs, services, and people that keep our communities and economy going!
Video continued:
Video continued:
It's 2025 - NO ONE should be without access to water.
And yet, thousands of members of the Navajo Nation don't have running water in their homes. It’s time to address the vast and urgent water needs of Tribal communities.
Women belong in leadership!
Only 150 women are in the House right now.
Women make up half the country’s population.
EQUAL REPRESENTATION NOW!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.