
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 4
Mike Thompson
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes43%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Mike Thompson
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 4
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 117 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Today marks 3 years since three students lost their lives in the Michigan State University shooting. May we continue to honor the victims by passing sensible legislation that will create a world without gun violence.
That's why I introduced the Prevent Presidential Profiteering Act to tax 100 percent of legal settlements paid to presidents.
Trump wants American taxpayers to pay him $10 billion. That's unacceptable. Instead of working for the American people, he is suing federal agencies and attempting to pocket our tax dollars for personal gain.
An important win for the First Amendment. Mark Kelly served our country in combat and now serves faithfully as U.S. Senator. Threatening to strip his rank or earned benefits for exercising his freedom of speech is cowardly and wrong.
www.politico.com/news/2026/02...
Yesterday, we took an important step by voting to repeal the president’s disastrous “emergency” tariffs on Canada. It’s one piece of the puzzle, and I’ll keep fighting to bring costs down for families.
In 2025, California families paid more than $2,300 more just to cover basic living expenses. We should be lowering costs for the American people, not pushing policies that make life more expensive.
It creates loopholes that you can drive a truck full of ghost guns through.
Congressional Republicans are making our communities less safe by creating loopholes for buying dangerous, unregulated firearms. The bill they brought to the floor today isn't about helping law enforcement get tasers. Law enforcement already use these tasers in all 50 states.
Read my statement on voting to end President Trump's "emergency" tariffs on Canada:
Good to meet with the California Rural Indian Health Board to discuss what’s needed to strengthen health care access for Tribal communities. I’m proud to support fair health care funding for California’s tribes.
Fortunate that my former staffer and all-around great guy Edgar wasn’t badly hurt when he was hit by a car on his bike today. Be careful on the roads and get better Edgar!
Our constitutional rights are not negotiable.
America is a nation of laws. That includes the Fourth Amendment. Stephen Miller has called requiring a judge’s warrant before entering someone’s home a “nonstarter” in ICE funding talks. The government should not be able to enter your home without judicial approval.
Last night, I voted to begin the process of rolling back tariffs that are driving up costs for American families and straining relationships with our allies. Today, I’ll vote to end the so-called “emergency” tariffs on Canada and get to lowering costs for the American people.
Republicans’ trade policies are so unpopular that Speaker Johnson is holding a vote in the dead of night to protect Trump’s harmful tariffs.
news.bgov.com/bloomberg-go...
Nonprofits should not risk losing their tax-exempt status simply because this administration and Congressional Republicans disagree with their views. Oversight must be even-handed, not used to target those that the majority doesn't agree with.
Thank you to all the young people across Lake, Napa, Sonoma, Solano, and Yolo counties who walked out to stand up against ICE terrorizing our communities. Proud of you for exercising your rights and speaking out against injustice.
Yet Congressional Republicans continue to look the other way. Accountability shouldn’t depend on who you agree with politically.
Members of this administration have deep financial and political ties to foreign actors, from lobbying relationships to business dealings that create clear conflicts of interest. These are real and serious concerns about foreign influence at the highest levels of government.
Foreign influence in American nonprofits deserves oversight. But if we’re serious about accountability, we can’t ignore what’s happening inside the White House and across this administration.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.