Their hype reels are akin to what you’d see at a football game and the ultimate disrespect to these Gold Star families.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 3
Lori Trahan
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes40%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Lori Trahan
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 3
SoupScore
Lori's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 56 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Nearly two weeks into Donald Trump’s war in Iran, 13 American servicemembers have lost their lives and hundreds more have been wounded – some critically.
War isn’t a video game, and the White House should stop treating it like one.
Thank you to the researchers and scientists who make this work worth fighting for. 🔬
Honored to be named a 2026 Champion of Science by The Science Coalition.
Every breakthrough starts with a question someone was brave enough to ask. Federal investment in basic science is how we answer those questions – and it's our most important long-term bet on the future.
As technology has made incredible advancements, the laws protecting our data haven’t changed in 50 years.
That’s why I’m rewriting the Privacy Act of 1974 – to make sure our personal data is safe from any bad actors.
I'm actively monitoring the reports of an active shooter Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, Michigan. Praying for the safety of worshipers and first responders who are on sight.
Donald Trump's war in Iran continues to drive gas prices higher and higher.
Republicans in Congress had the chance to end the war and bring our servicemembers home. Almost every single one of them voted NO.
We were fortunate that this case moved quickly, but the next family may not be so lucky. We simply cannot allow this to become the new normal.
This case demands answers. What directives are being issued to agents authorizing the detention of minors? Who approved this? And what is DHS doing to ensure it never happens again?
This is what it looks like when we show up for our constituents. To be absolutely clear, a 14-year-old girl should never have been detained in the first place. The fact that it took a federal court order to return a child to her family is a damning indictment of DHS policy.
I want to thank her attorney, Andrew Lattarulo, for his tireless and swift work to secure her release. I also want to thank @warren.senate.gov, @markey.senate.gov and @pressley.house.gov for standing up immediately and fighting alongside us.
🚨UPDATE: A federal judge just ordered that the 14-year-old girl detained in Marlborough last night must be returned to Massachusetts and reunited with her family!
This is the right outcome, and it could not have come soon enough.
In the meantime, DHS must abandon its clearly adopted policy of using children as bait to detain and deport family members and instead focus its efforts on violent criminals.
But now, federal immigration agents seem to be doing it again, this time here in Massachusetts.
I am demanding her immediate release. She should be returned home to her family this afternoon and able to go back to school tomorrow.
The nation watched in horror as a little boy with a blue bunny hat and Spiderman backpack was taken into custody by federal immigration authorities. The ordeal was so heinous that a federal judge ordered his release and called it ‘cruel’ and ‘bereft of human decency.’
As a mother to 15- and 11-year old daughters, I am furious. This is not immigration enforcement. It’s the deliberate targeting of a child to inflict maximum pain on her family.
Two months ago, ICE detained five-year-old Liam Ramos in Minnesota under similar circumstances.
Yesterday, a 14-year-old girl from Marlborough was detained by federal immigration agents. A child with no criminal history was taken into custody in an apparent overnight attempt to use her as a hostage to coerce her father into turning himself in for deportation.
At a moment when American servicemembers are deployed abroad defending our nation, these nominees are answering that same call, and our community is better for it.
To the families in the room today: you raised patriots. Thank you.
Congratulations to each of our nominees. We are so proud of you. 🇺🇸
I had the privilege of celebrating some of the most remarkable young people in our district — the nominees to our nation’s service academies.
These young men and women didn’t choose the easy path. They chose to serve.
Grateful to the incredible folks at the Food Bank who work tirelessly to prevent children and families from going to bed hungry each night.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.