Republicans’ Agriculture funding bill gets rid of nutritional assistance for 6.7 million women and kids.
Our babies need more fruits and vegetables - not less. @democrats-appropriations.house.gov will always fight for more nutritious meals for kids.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Florida District 25
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes43%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 25
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratFlorida District 25
SoupScore
Debbie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 20 sponsored · 106 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Republican Agriculture funding bill isn't fiscal responsibility – it's fiscal cruelty.
Moms in my district need the food programs they're cutting. Billionaires don't need more tax breaks.
The PAWS Act helps domestic violence survivors leave abusive homes without leaving a pet behind.
Republicans’ Agriculture bill eliminated all funding for this vital program, but @underwood.house.gov, @democrats-appropriations.house.gov & I fought to get $1.5M restored. And we’ll fight for more.
After a 12 hour Military Construction and VA markup yesterday, @democrats-appropriations.house.gov are back at it with the Agriculture funding bill.
Republicans are trying pay for billionaire tax breaks by cutting food assistance for women and children and slashing the FDA. We won't stand for it.
The Republican Agriculture and FDA funding bill cuts food assistance for kids, hurts our farmers, makes record corporate giveaways — and ignores rising food prices.
Watch @democrats-appropriations.house.gov fight back:
www.youtube.com/live/N2bbh7-...
Yesterday, I stood with my colleagues in a bipartisan vigil to honor Sarah Milgram and Yaron Lischinsky.
The fight against hate should never be partisan. We must stand together to stop antisemitism. May their memories be for a blessing.
We just marked up the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs funding bill from 3pm to 3am.
Republicans pushed low-quality privatized care on Veterans.
@democrats-appropriations.house.gov know those who served deserve better and we fought it.
Reposted byRep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
🚨HAPPENING NOW IN FULL COMMITTEE
House Republicans are laying out their plan to privatize VA hospitals and hollow out funding for veteran education, job support, food assistance, and housing. Watch along as Democrats fight back.
youtu.be/4yMpuHCaCsE
Republicans already caved to Trump's tariff taxes that raise prices on families.
Tonight, they refused to even find out what Trump's erratic tariff policies will do to drive up military construction costs.
What are they so afraid of?
The Republican MilCon/VA funding bill PROHIBITS the VA from following the law to keep guns out of the hands of those deemed a danger to themselves or others.
Thousands of veterans die from suicide every year, and this bill makes them less safe.
This indictment is a clear attempt to intimidate Congress and criminalize dissent.
It will not succeed. My colleagues and I will continue to conduct lawful oversight and speak out.
I fully support @replamonica.bsky.social as she fights off this blatantly political prosecution.
The Republican MilCon/VA funding bill fails to hold VA Secretary Collins accountable for mass firings of veterans and attempting to transfer hundreds of millions in funds without congressional approval.
Republicans may cave to Trump and give up Congress's power of the purse. Democrats never will.
I hear stories from veterans across the country about how the Trump Administration has turned their lives upside down over night.
The Republican MilCon/VA funding bill does nothing to stop it. We should never treat our veterans like that.
As @democrats-appropriations.house.gov MilCon/VA Ranking Member, I hear from veterans across the country about how DOGE and the Administration's actions hurt them.
The Republican MilCon/VA funding bill does nothing to help.
Reposted byRep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
This year's Military Construction & Veterans Affairs Appropriations bill is a step toward enacting the Project 2025 goal of privatizing the VA. This bill betrays our veterans, including women and LGBTQI+ veterans who would be denied access to medically necessary healthcare. youtu.be/UL57bmYhFxk
The Republican MilCon/VA funding bill hurdles us toward VA privatization – straight from the Project 2025 agenda.
Veterans want VA health care because they know the VA cares about them, unlike this Administration.
The Republican MilCon/VA bill fails our veterans. It scams them out of quality medical care and lines corporate hospitals' coffers.
As Ranking Member of the @democrats-appropriations.house.gov MilCon/VA subcommittee, I'm leading the charge to fight back.
Watch:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yMp...
Que Trump retire el parole, el TPS, la reunificación familiar y ahora las visas es la última TRAICIÓN a las familias cubanas y venezolanas que ya han pasado por suficientes dificultades.
Lucharé para revertir esta injusticia.
elpais.com/us/migracion...
PBS South Florida educates millions of our kids, provides fact-based programming, warns families about hurricanes, and so much more.
Congress will vote on eliminating their funding this week. But I'll oppose it. We should expand access to quality programs - not limit it.
Honored to nominate some of South Florida's most talented young people for appointments to America's military academies.
Thank you for your dedication. You'll make us all proud!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 3971 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H.R. 4294 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.