Instead of cutting costs for working families, Donald Trump is slashing the federal investments that fund their lifesaving care, fuel their local economy, and lower their health care costs.
It’s cruel, short-sighted, and will cost jobs and devastate millions of families.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts
Elizabeth Warren
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 915
Yes26%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align95%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Elizabeth's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 88 sponsored · 386 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Part Three:
Part Two:
I often talk about righteous fights. Make no mistake: we are in one.
This fight will be long. Trump will continue to distract, divide, and demoralize us.
But when things get tough, there is only one option ahead of us: Nevertheless, we must persist.
🧵Part one:
If Republicans really wanted to cut costs for families, then they wouldn’t slash the funds we use to educate and feed our kids, cut access to health care coverage, allow oil companies to pollute our air and water, and shovel even more money to defense contractors.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Hi Bluesky! Let me introduce myself: I’m U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin and I proudly represent the great state of Wisconsin. 🐄🧀
I may be new here, but my story and fight have remained the same. ⬇️ (1/7)
If you're one of the 40 million people with student loans, Elon Musk’s team may have gotten access to your Social Security number, income data, and personal information.
I'm leading 18 senators in an investigation into DOGE’s actions at the Department of Education.
Musk's latest power grab: your Medicare benefits.
Elon - you're looking in the wrong place. Private insurers in Medicare Advantage overcharged taxpayers by at least $83 billion in 2024 alone.
Our service members should not have to deal with profiteering landlords jacking up their rents.
Secretary Hegseth should investigate and protect military families from predatory companies like RealPage.
A federal court just blocked Elon Musk from interfering with the federal government’s payments system.
There is power in fighting back. We won’t let up until this block is permanent.
No more business as usual. Donald Trump and Elon Musk are imposing pain on millions of people.
Tonight, we’re taking this fight to the Senate floor.
Russ Vought - author of Project 2025 - is up for a vote, and Democrats are using every second to throw a wrench in their plan.
Here’s one thing that I’m watching with Donald Trump’s tariffs:
Which billionaires and giant corporations will buy themselves loopholes?
In his 1st term, well-connected insiders got tariff waivers.
This is one more way to make corporate CEOs kiss Trump's ring.
Elon Musk and Donald Trump are trying to drive a wrecking ball through our government.
The people who will pay a real price are the hard-working families who are just trying to make it to the end of the month.
We must use every tool to fight back.
Secretary Bessent needs to explain how this happened, who had or has access to this information, and what protections are in place to protect the economy, national security, and Americans’ private data.
Treasury says “currently” a set of staff members have “read-only” access but what about non-Treasury employees, like those working for Elon Musk and DOGE?
It’s just inconsistent with multiple public reports.
I called on Secretary Bessent to answer why and how he gave Elon Musk and his cronies permission to access government payment systems.
The response back raises more questions than answers.
Elon Musk wants the power to cut off programs that pay for your grandma's nursing home stay.
There's nothing "efficient" about ripping health care away from millions.
www.nytimes.com/.../musk-fed...
RFK Jr. is a danger to public health. Every Republican senator who votes yes will own the consequences.
When RFK Jr. follows anti-vax conspiracies instead of science, when he greenlights Trump's anti-abortion agenda, when he cuts healthcare for seniors — remember who voted yes.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History915 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
915 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (47-41) |
| 2026-09-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2026-09-30 | H.R. 9340 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (57-43, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-30 | H.R. 7008 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-29 | S. Res. 852 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 852 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-51) |
| 2026-09-29 | S.J. Res. 197 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-51) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (77-22) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-54, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (1-94) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (96-1) |
| 2026-09-24 | H. Con. Res. 89 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (74-25, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Amendment Agreed to (77-23) |
| 2026-09-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2026-09-22 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (70-21, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-45) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2026-09-17 | S. 4668 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (77-22) |
| 2026-09-15 | S. 4668 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (74-24, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-09-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-46) |
| 2026-08-08 | S. 5271 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (61-32) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
| 2026-07-28 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-07-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2026-07-23 | S.J. Res. 180 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 19Next →